KH-Vids Death Note Game 8.0

Discussion in 'The Spam Zone' started by Destined, Nov 13, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    I accuse Steal The Hail Based on the fact that he was online just before the round began, yet hasn't been on after Shades announced the official begining of the round.

    There has also been no kills... meaning its a possibilty that he is Kira, but hasn't had a chance to kill yet.
     
  2. Fayt-Harkwind Where yo curly mustache at?

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Location:
    453
    and for an added bonus I accuse Graxe XD
     
  3. jafar custom title

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    1,652
    You read my mind.
     
  4. ArchVice Gummi Ship Junkie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Omnipresent
    85
    356
    Still no leads? Well, I'm starting to get a clue.

     
  5. Destined Working for WDW

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Location:
    Lost in the Rockies
    191
    Interogation:

    Steal the Hail was taken to police headquarters and questioned. Little was uncovered except for the fact that StH suffers from a phobia of snow. He was released due to a lack of evidence.

    DEATH:
    After the interrogation, ICSP walks out of a building and gets shot down by Saki, who is later caught and convicted of 1st degree murder.

    Time of death: 7 pm PST

    Fayt:
    Your accusation will not be accepted because there is 12 players. Therefore you need evidence as to why.

    Pika:
    I'm updating the list.
     
  6. Princess Celestia Supreme Co-Ruler of Equestria

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    166
    [​IMG]
     
  7. P Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    366
  8. Tikem Gummi Ship Junkie

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Location:
    Finland
    67
    396
    I have to agree with Pika in this one.
     
  9. P Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    366
    Fantastic. I have support! Time to move in for the kill!

    *Dances in a circle chanting in a singsong voice*

    "Kira got it wrong! Kira got it wrong! Kira got it wrong! Kira got it wrong! Kira got it wrong!"

    Seriously though, this should mean we get a clue, right? After all, if both the きら and the しにがむ break the rules, they should compensate.
     
  10. Tikem Gummi Ship Junkie

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Location:
    Finland
    67
    396
    Then how do you explain why Saki wasn't controlled by DN?
     
  11. Fayt-Harkwind Where yo curly mustache at?

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Location:
    453
    Oh I have to give proof? well at the time of the death note being dropped I remember Graxe, StH and myself being online and I think Graxe deleted a post inbetween the ones Shades did so Graxe must have it, but by now he probbibly would of switched it.
    Still i'm accusing Graxe with that evidence XD *waits to be killed*
     
  12. Fayt-Harkwind Where yo curly mustache at?

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Location:
    453
    I've made a fatal mistake, I got my suspect wrong
     
  13. Fayt-Harkwind Where yo curly mustache at?

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Location:
    453
    Thats a little too obvious with the evidence I have aswell, I know who Kira is for sure but does Kira still have the death note by now?

    Next game I will play better *waits to die*
     
  14. Xaale Sylph of Hope

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Location:
    Land of Autumn and Angels
    298
    Ahhhh already I'm behind T__T

    What did I miss when I was on my mini-vacation?
     
  15. jafar custom title

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    1,652
    I killed ICSP. .
     
  16. P Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    366
    Of your own choice no less.

    My proof is that the Death Note would not work in those conditions.

    1. You cannot use a human under your control to kill another human.

    2. If two names are written down, the details are ignored and both die of heart attacks.

    3. You have 23 days to control someone, then they die. Death Row and Court takes far longer than that, so Saki cannot be executed within 23 days. In the case of them not dying within the 23 days, they simply die of a heart attack.

    So either the Shinigami let that little rule slide, in which case he should be captured and tortured by the King, meaning the Kira would be unable to get the Shinigami Eyes due to a lack of Shinigami, or Saki killed ICSP 'cause he felt murderous.

    Oh, and Saki's death has not been stated yet. He is still in prison. Can I bail him out?
     
  17. Fayt-Harkwind Where yo curly mustache at?

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Location:
    453
    Pika, i'll loan you teh cash if I don't die when Shades appears (i'm so going to die)
     
  18. P Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    366
    Okay...

    I'm using L's legacy. If Near can afford to pour billions out like that, I can afford to bail out a detective.

    Edit: I get the Harkwind fund?! SWEET! Sorry Saki, but I'm off to Hawaii!
     
  19. P Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    366
    It did seem a tad ridiculous. Surely he could have used counterfeit stuff instead?
     
  20. Cocohints "Up to now, the most discussed topic is global war

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Location:
    Hunting for the Behemoth King fffffffff-
    123
    Soooooooooo why does everyone want the shinigami to update the list? :x


    In the game:

    Fearless
    Fayt-Harkwind
    Saki
    coco
    Xaale
    Graxe
    Steal the Hail
    Heartless_Vice
    ICSP
    Repliku *
    Pika_power
    TrueKeybladeMaster

    *don't know for sure if he's in or not.

    1st accusation: - released.
    ICSP accuse Saki with spoiler tag lol.

    2nd accusation: - released.
    ICSP accuse Steal the Hail.

    3rd accusation: - not interrogated yet.
    Fayt-Harkwind accuse Graxe.


    Deaths:

    1st victim: ICSP by wrong accusation.


    Is this right so far?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.