Click on this if you unimformed!!!!

Discussion in 'The Spam Zone' started by Dreadnought, Dec 27, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dreadnought Twilight Town Denizen

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Location:
    No idea......
    15
    287
    Hey! Cowboy Clucky here! is gonna
    teach about....... One World!!!!! I know they always told you that it was a way to make
    world peace..... But, which do you want? World peace is made by the world being controlled
    by one person and if you don't like the laws, too bad cuz what he says goes and if you try to make
    a separate country for you to have freedom..... Ohhhh Noooo he'll blast your head cuz
    what he says GOES!!!!! or do you want separate countries in which every country
    has different laws and too bad if theres a few wars cuz at least ya have freedom, right?

    So, even now, people are trying to put one world into your mind by posters, movies,
    tv, art, and other things that are sooooo sly that you are brainwashed without realizing it...
    Hitler tried to take over the world but we all know how that turned out!!!!! So tell me
    your thoughts and, this week do something to help people escape one world.
    Cause one world won't have world peace...... It will only have one country that
    might break out into war at any second....... So tell me whatcha think!!!!
     
  2. Chad Thundercucc The dharma of valvu; the dream of a clatoris

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Anytown, USA.
    472
    Um, this is kinda...spammy, but you have a point. If there is world peace, there may have to be one leader, though not necissarily. Though, I see your point.
     
  3. White_Rook Looser than a wizard's sleeve.

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Location:
    A chess board
    69
    So unity under our race as humans-- acknowledging all that is common between us and throwing away petty distinguishing characteristics-- would be worse off than separation due to frivolous cultural and physical differences? Laws are simply relative to circumstances, which can be changed with enough work. I fail to see any connection between uniting the people of earth and it starting a war. Who said it had to be under one person anyway?
     
  4. Repliku Chaser

    353
    Who says it has to be 'one' person making decisions for a world unity? I would think it would work more democratic than that as there are many cultural differences between places that would need to be adhered to and comprehended. I would believe in the end, there would have to be 'nation' leaders still, but the act of lowering patriotism would be a necessity as it sparks many issues. It's nice to know you come from somewhere but radical patriotism is pretty darn idiotic.

    I think many people would like a more 'open world' where we can go to places, see people, experience culture etc, and not always have to think about war, strife, and also those stupid computer jerks that steal credit cards and email us 1000s of spams and set up businesses for failure would finally be closed down because they wouldn't have diplomatic immunity. There would be more talking and dictators could be dealt with easier, civilians could speak out against abuse and all better and people could move more to where they'd want to live and not be imprisoned or enslaved. There could be great benefits to a more 'worldly' world instead of how things are today. We have more communication than ever with regular common people and that is in itself fascinating. We can learn a lot more on other countries, viewpoints, etc and it's a lot harder to cover up.

    So, to me, I don't see really people giving up 'nation' controls. I would think of them as big states or provinces where there are rules and laws for each area that fits the people of that region, while maintaining other rules all nations would agree to abide by to be members. I would think also we'd vote for who are 'national' leaders are still as many places do, and also there'd be some way to vote for a president or prime minister or some new word we'd use. I don't see it as a bad thing except I'd hope we'd also deal with the banks and put them more in control. They are doing crazy things to economy and screwing many places over. I highly doubt that power though would ever just be in 'one man's' hands. The nations we live under are too big for one person to deal with, let alone a world.
     
  5. Dreadnought Twilight Town Denizen

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Location:
    No idea......
    15
    287
    Well, I didn't say that they would start out as one man rules all..... It would probably be afew years
    before somebody tries to take over........ Someone would eventually take over and whoever does
    will probably go nuts with power (Hitler used to hang wallpaper and was a nice guy before
    he got control and look what happened to him!) everybody needs a leader to keep them from
    going nuts. And if one guy controls the planet. He will have no rules....... no rules means
    he can do anything he wants..... So a nut job dictator like that is bound to start a few wars....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.