Cycle 1: Most Likely to be on Staff

vcdgrszdzdfxffyjnrfbsrfgbsffnbsfgf d fsfdt wdhhw rrhsd f hsd ahsfgshd
adad h ffvbdscvxvpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppbpbs
f sdhsdf f hsh s hdf sdf sd f


So yes, of course these are the KHV 2012 Awards. No sanity required! : D

Please vote honestly and truly!
If you change your mind on a vote, you can alter it by PMing Misty and you may only do this the once. So try not to bother the old dear!


Enjoy guys and best of luck!

 

Not sure if some of these are cereal.

 

Makaze Flakes and Amaury-os?

 

​Amaury has more chance than you. You'll be awright, tho.

 

Nice.

 

Aw, I'm flattered to have been nominated. Thanks peeps.

 

Again I was nominated? Wow.

Anyway, my dear Daxa.

 

Obviously a sign. We should start a petition!

 

Dear god please no I wouldn't be able to handle all those updates on the weather.

 

And the times people get off the forums.

And time zones.

And bad music.

And ignoring posts.

 

That's bullying.
Ban him, Amaury.

 

Go Akaz, go. Nobody would be as good on staff as that guy.

 

I voted Mak because he'd actually be good at the job despite friction.

 

Maybe it'll happen on December 21st- HOLY CRAP!

 

I see you did not take my suggestion of changing it to "Best Potential Staff".

My reasoning for the change:

With Most Likely to be on Staff, the chances of a member getting accepted by the current staff are implied. It requires prediction based on multiple factors rather than a member's personal merit as a potential staff member.

The problem with it is the semantics of "Most Likely to be on" versus "Best Potential". The words "Most Likely" are interchangeable with the words "Highest Chance".

Because no description or definition is given in the thread beyond the title, the semantics of the titles are very important. Is there any reason why it should not be changed? It would make the choice easier and would be based in personal merit, so there is no downside.

Misty got the wrong impression when I suggested this before but ignored me when I corrected her, so I would like to make clear that I am not suggesting a separate poll. I am suggesting replacing this one with "Best Potential Staff" because "Most Likely to be on Staff" is obsolete and overly complicated.

Because this poll is already up, I mean to suggest this for next year. Please keep it in mind.

 

Taking the awards too seriously: achieved.

 

Even so, my reasoning is sound and it is not too much trouble to change it.

 

No one gives a ****. And what Jiku said.

 

What'd I say?