Your interpretation of my words is not my problem. Beast.
The only beast I want is you.
Rossexual, tyvm!
Ah, thanks for clarifying. I put in the sexism part in there, as it seemed like it was okay because generally people think it's okay to assume that an individual will molest, because that individual is a man. Pretty much, yeah.
Of course, it may be inaccurate, but it's still not that uncommon, is my point. But I agree, asking an adult to move is fine, if there is a free seat, etc. But in this case, he was replaced. Of course, if it saves a kid from the experience, I agree, it's worth it, but keep in mind that only being accused of being a potential molester can be devastating. False rape accusations ruins lives, and if the general thought process is "It's better if a woman sits next to this kid, so s/he won't be molested," it will lead to hostility from many, including me. If someone asked me to trade places due to that, I would start some serious sh|t, as there is no basis for the assumption. (Statistics can't be applied to an individual). I am, however, very interested in the appearance of the man in question, as that may have a significant impact on the judgement call.
You can harass me anytime :*
Not a briefcase, honey, my phone. So I can listen to it when I need to... get some inspiration... <3
I do agree that it isn't a tremendous inconvenience, but the problem I have here is the reasoning behind the moving of him. The basis of moving him was nothing but the fact that he was a man, and that, to me, doesn't make sense. And Chev posted the two articles regarding molestation, but calling it common is taking it a bit too far, simply because molestation is not common. Most children feel more comfortable around foreign women, because of this. Kids aren't exactly smart, but if they see a man gets moved because he might do something bad, don't you think that will lead to them assuming that men generally do bad things to you? Many women molest children as well, it's just not as widely "known"/noticed. Statistically, yes, more men molest kids than women, however, it varies from study to study. Studies of sexual misconduct in US schools with female offenders have shown mixed results with rates between 4% to 43% of female offenders (Source) 7% is not really much of a difference. It's just the assumption that because men might molest a child, they are told to move. If the child asked for it, or if the parents specifically asked for it, then I get it. But if no one asks for it, then they have no reason to do so. (Also; the reason they do this, I believe, is not for the safety of the child, but to avoid law-suits, which is ******ed)
As long as sound-effects are included, yes.
This has nothing to do with personal liberties, though - This is prejudice. This is not surprising to me, though. Men often suffer from this type of prejudice/judgement.
Spongebob should also be marked as crap...
*Clicks link* *Hears voice* *fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*
X-ray radiation/waves are harmless in small doses. In large doses it's harmful, but this was not major at all.... Not even newsworthy, in my opinion.
Only Americans do this. I can't think of any other group of citizens known for doing this. Anyway - I find it kind of funny, to be honest. It's not that big of a deal - He wasn't injured or anything.
[video=youtube;wXw6znXPfy4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXw6znXPfy4[/video]
Count going up. You'd better not lock this at 49...
Watched my own video... Oh the shame! [video=youtube;dYNGdsSwY1M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYNGdsSwY1M[/video] [video=youtube;CXV5PmnQmMk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXV5PmnQmMk[/video] [video=youtube;FhkCK9ElqEc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhkCK9ElqEc[/video]
It has been forever since I made a sign. New HDD with none of the older Brushes, etc. Anyway, I prefer to be a bit minimalistic and use grunge brushes. Render I used v1. v2. Comments and Criticism is highly appreciated. PS: I'm not too fond of the text.
... We do .
I'm offended! A ladyfriend of mine.
