I'd go with the highwind 6 if that's what you have. You aren't going to get high scores or anything, but you can get through it. If it's where I think it is, you have that one thing that rolls up behind you and tries to smash and crush you, but if you use lock on and hit at the right spot, it sends the thing skittering back. Do that a couple times more and you can clear that level. Of course, if you aren't at that area, disregard all the nonsense I just said.
The first time I fought Sephiroth, I beat him with the Ultima Weapon, but the 2nd time through, because I beat him for someone else, I used Oblivion. It works out fine to do it that way.
12, 23, 7, 13, 6, 29
L! Though all of the names up there are awesome. But my vote is for L.
Well, that is kind of lame. Some people though post things to show off code and what could be done and I see nothing wrong with that, but yeah, if someone 'cheats' and posts, it's not too hard to tell they did since they have some things often that those of us who went through the game for over 99 hours don't. It's kind of like bragging you made homemade cake and yet there's a box of Betty Crocker cake mix behind the cake picture. They did some work, but it's obvious they didn't do the work from scratch.
I don't understand the question. The fourth member was already named in the Organization. Do you refer to a 14th member?
It seems that way because Ansem (the Heartless) was more a mental fighter and really, he didn't attack physically but through the use of the Heartless that was connected to him. He obviously could fight with 'Riku's' skill which he stole but in the end, he didn't seem to be a brawler or anything other than taking Riku's talents in the Riku 2 fight. However, being able to warp reality in Darkness and to do different things to himself and others made him 'tough' even if in reality the game final boss fight was simple. Xemnas was a warrior through and through and that was easily noted and he did have that ability without taking from Riku or anyone truly. So physical fight, I'd say Xemnas would own Ansem but if it was a mental/magical one, it might go more to Ansem.
I never use the cheats as I think they are boring and just with a game like KH and KH2, I can't figure out why to bother. If it was a super hard game, sure but KH games on Proud Mode are not that difficult. However, that's not to say I don't like messing around with coding to get cool things to happen that you can't ordinarily see in the game, like taking Riku out of TWTNW and changing Sora's weapons etc. That is just fun. People that do use cheats though generally just want to see things happen faster in a game, such as the abilities and leveling up faster, getting items so they don't have to go looking, etc and so they can get through the game faster to get to see the story and such. It's a way to just make things happen faster.
Xehanort's Heartless was not so much a 'physical' fighter as a more mind powered combatant. Xemnas was a more physical combatant. To me, I would say since both had the power to manipulate Darkness and matter about them in worlds that were sort of not on the same plane as the rest of the game, and all, they were both pretty powerful. Though Xehanort's Heartless was somewhat easier in KH than Xemnas was when we look in terms of game play, I'd say both were around equals, just in their different ways.
I'd have to say I'd rate them somewhat different. Agrabah - not so worth it. it could have been better. Then again, Aladdin 2 was sucky so it makes sense why this wasn't so good either. Halloween Town - worth it. Christmas Town was cool and I love Halloween Town. Atlantica - not so worth it, but at least it was easy to get through and didn't take much time to complete. I'd have disliked it more if I had to be there more than I was. Olympus Coliseum - worth it. A lot of plot was here and Hades is terrific. Land of Dragons - worth it. It was cool to see the world and all. I think it could have been a bit better but it was humorous and entertaining. Pride Lands - not so worth it. Seeing Simba in that light of being so pathetic was just seemingly out of character to me. For being a great summon in KH, he was really meh in his own world. It had its highlights and doing time as a lion cub was cool, but I think the plot could have been better. Beast's Castle - worth it. It was cool to see Beast's castle and roam through it, getting a feel for the ambiance and all. Disney Castle and Timeless River - worth it. Seeing the places and going back to even seeing the characters done up in the Timeless River artwork was all good to me. Port Royal - worth it but well it could also have been better. Some of the voice acting, especially Elizabeth and sometimes Jack, was not that good.
Wow, that's just a set up in the end. Many of the children in the ME have the name Muhammad and what the kids did was innocent and she let them decide on the names and choose. Unfortunately this sort of thing does happen in some places in the ME when people do go there to help out and unless the UK fights to get this woman out of there, she probably will face that. It's deplorable and only confuses the children as well; especially when one of them even says the name was put into the voting in the first place because he shared that name. What a shame. Hatreds do run deep and I'd like to say if such a thing happened in countries where Islam is not prevalent that we would be much better, but in that case I'd wonder if parents wouldn't complain too, even if the woman wouldn't get 40 lashings. =:/
I don't really think life is that complex. Though I also don't believe in God at all either and think that people make up their purposes for themselves, even if they are religious because they also decide to follow that sort of path. Sometimes adults steer their children to becoming something or people use religion as a way to say there's more to it, but life to me is simply to do more than just exist; especially because we have this miraculous frontal lobe that keeps us sentient. Anything can and will exist for its time allotted, but to live life is to be a part of it, do the things you want to, accomplish goals you set out for yourself and experience and even dive into what is there to offer. This I feel holds true whether religious or not. I also feel, as CtR said, that there may always be strife and disagreement; friction between people. We can have arguments with people and some simply take things too seriously, while others intentionally are being duo-natured with negative intentions schemed. Accepting that we all have our negative and positive features does help in learning tolerance but sadly there is a point where a line must be drawn on what any society can accept from a single member or group. That line will vary but still, it is important. I do think though that as we attempt to dismiss certain things that are really irrelevant that people mark as different to others (which some instigate wars) which really should not matter; such as color of skin, religion, gender, sexual preference and most cultural ethnics, we can realize we are 'people' and start trying to get over on instincts. Instinctive prejudice is a fast determiner to 'avoid danger' and be aware, but as we are sentient, we can teach ourselves knowledge that just because someone is not like you, you don't have to distrust or despise them. This does help even now with the more communication we are able to get and the integration of cultural groups, but we have a lot to work on. There will always be some people that are going to cause the immense problems, but if the rest of us work on doing things right and enjoy the ride, (the theme of it all) then we'll be alright and get some good times over the bad.
It's yo' birtday, it's yo' birtday! Happy B-day CtR! *tosses confetti around*
I would say Romeo and Juliet had a love for each other and all but like movies and novels etc, there's was a 'romanticized' love going off also their deep drive to be with each other not just 'despite' diversity, but perhaps because of it. I can't say I am a romantic at heart, though I of course show the persons I care about that I do in fact love them, which includes time with the family, friends, and relationship person, buying gifts and well doing things together. Romantic love seems to be a spruced up notion of adding drama and flavor to a relationship I tend to think, and if you cannot survive without the drama and flare, zeal etc, then I'd have to say that 'love' can die sooner than a love that is where you accept the other person is a real being with flaws just as you are. Romance is like a stage between 'love' and 'infatuation' driving the force of obsession to the heart, but as long as both people are mutual, it is there. So to me, I guess I'd have this chart of stages really to include Love, Obsession/Romantic Love, and Infatuation as romantic love seems to be between them both and can either evolve to the highest stage of love or can just become a dying infatuation where once the flame dies, it's over. Romeo and Juliet may have, if they had not had to die, gone on for a while with their things and kept together or sooner or later it would have burnt out. It's hard to say since they were doomed from the beginning.
That was a very interesting viewpoint to read and a nice way of saying it. I agree that life is a journey and you just go with it. When you do things, you make choices of going left or right. Sometimes the vehicle decides it's going the other way but you can always find something new or some way back to the path you were on. There are people on the ride that will attempt to ruin it but despite who gets off and on it, the ride does continue.
Time is a concept of measuring 'motion'. Despite all the bad Star Trek episodes etc, going back in 'reverse' time wouldn't be that. It would be displacing oneself and reappearing at a point of motion again. I really don't think 'anti-time' could possibly mean 'reverse motion' as it is -still- a motion. Motion and movement is opposite of stagnation and something being frozen. There is a concept that physicists talk about which expresses that even as you are now, you are not the same person you were when you were born. That a molecule of water you drank could have past through the intestines of some famous person at one time etc. That matter which is around us is a stage of a 2nd level sight which we can 'see' and feel but if we could pull ourselves out of that and understand that a wall is made out of atoms, and we too are made out of atoms, a stone is made out of atoms, water is, etc, that the progression of movement on a cellular level can be measured and that we all change, leave things behind and also gain new things...time is very expressive with motion and we and everything else around us is that way. I do tend to like this theory and also if it is true, then the opposite of motion must be no motion; not reverse motion. I do not really believe there is such a thing as 'reverse' motion or going back in time as many science fiction novels etc depict. If people could go 'time traveling' I think it would work more on the lines of entanglement principles or maybe even wormholes, but really...even if people could go to another -time-, wouldn't they again be bound to the rules of that principle of motion yet again? I don't think therefore that anti-time could be reverse anything and instead you still progress forward or the possibility of doing nothing at all may exist.
Time is just a man made way of calculating the natural motion of things that exist and also can be used to describe how we age and components break down and the stimulation of cell movement such as with freezing or weather, decomposition and how even the land changes etc. We denote numbers, calculations etc to expressing this movement to understand how the universe works, our world moves, cellular structure of objects etc changes etc. Even if there's no necessary 'word' to describe 1 billionth of a second, we can write it out numerically. As for 'anti-time', I would say I don't think there's such a thing except to express null or a void where nothing exists and no motion happens because of it. Also, Axel's#1Fangirl brings up another good point to this. The way we perceive colors is how we label them. We give them names too and even colors right now can be 'coded' numerically. Even our number system in itself could be changed and there are quite a few ways to do things. Most often we use the 10s system to count but there are measurements of numerics also done commonly in 8s, 12s and 16s which are used for computers, sciences and different scale measurements of time etc.
There are 4 year olds that tell you to 'F' off and suck on 'that' etc and some know enough what they are referring to, even if they don't get it entirely. There have been 8 year olds and younger children that have been molested and/or raped and violated. They also get put in situations and adults will be talking 'smut' and can even 'scheme' things about kids at a dinner table. Some kids don't even 'realize' they were molested because the adults are that sly and then later the person looks back and has to ask 'just what was Uncle Bob touching me there for?'. Finding out 'later' in life that you were molested by someone you thought was trying to help you or check you over for wounds etc...that's just not cool and sends enough of people to the psychiatrist later. There have been 8 year olds that have become sexually active, doing acts of masturbation. There are some kids that start masturbation even before 4 years old. They don't 'know' what they are doing but they just know it can feel 'good'. As 'gross' as it can be to think of having your 8 year old kid in a health class to explain sexual education, I would say by 8 years old my own kid (when I have one) will probably already know the sorts of things they should teach there because the last thing I want is to see my kid get 'manhandled' by some adult or even by some other kid who becomes sexually intrigued and convinces the kid to go to the 'playground' and investigate etc. I don't think the kid needs to know 'everything' such as putting on condoms or doing sexual acts etc, but I do think explaining how 'babies are made' and also warning children of dangers and to know if someone is touching areas they should not to 'say something' etc would help things out. That way if some uncle or whatever does something bad, you'll know it. Some might say they'd teach their kid that sort of thing, but sadly, not all parents will because sex is so damned taboo. Of course we don't want kids 'having' sex, but the reality of the situation is that if you don't make your kid smart, school doesn't...someone else is going to and it won't be the way that kid would have wished to learn. So, I'd just have to say, a 'lite' version of Sex Ed I would think would not be that bad. It's something the kid can pay some attention to, but also go on being a kid and not worry about it.
There is a 0:00. Whether numerically you go into saying that '0' exists or not, or in physics...everyone KNOWS the number 0 exists. You count with it, do math with it etc. Time is the 'human's' way of measuring the natural motion that always is in existence. It is nothing more than that, truly. Humans have put 'number' values and also name values to things for a very long time. It's part of communication. We label everything and the measurement of motion is definitely one of those things. However, just because there is a 0:00 which marks the new day, it does not mean that 'in physics' this time cannot exist. It means it's a rotation of numbers starting at the beginning once again after finishing a cycle. Also, another thing to note is that there's a good chance, 'midnight' isn't the 'exact' time of motion when a new day will begin. We monitor time as we can and all, but if we actually went by the way the earth does spin around the sun and calculated it all, we would have different times for each value of day to include some days are longer in day light, some longer in night, etc. If midnight is supposed to be the absolute point between night to day, that would shift around constantly, were we accurate, though in most places only by a couple hours at most. (very southern or northern people it would be different). So I think the 'time' thing is cool, but 0:00 exists to refresh to the new day so that we are not off by any real amount of time to the 24 hour standard. In actual motion, however, the earth is not just on pause at that time etc and movement continues as usual. It's because we gave it a 'value' that the point in 'time' actually exists at all. As for my thoughts otherwise, I like night time and the shift between 'day and night' numerically is cool. I enjoy the night or day and sitting out in either and watching the sky. I've done what others consider a waste at times and just went out on nice nights or mornings and wandered about or sat at a beach and vegged, watching the sky and all. Good stuff.
I tend to believe the opposite. Infatuation seems to be where people go on that they 'need' to be with this person and all and it can even be to the point that you are stalking them etc. Love doesn't stalk or try to 'possess' like that. People who love each other sometimes let each other go. It is an understood thing that things aren't working out, or one has to move etc. Even if upset at one another, people who genuinely had love for one another can generally continue to move on in their life without hating the other person and can work civilly together, become friends because they were great friends any way etc. You don't see that behavior in someone who is infatuated. The person is irate if broken up with or a friend has to move etc. They are demanding and ticked off and hate the other person. The other person can be saying they have to go etc and the person who is infatuated will be thinking of him/herself instead of the burden on both people. To me, that is one of the signs of division. Love 'wants' and can have, and can share etc. Obsession is the fact you "need this fix now". Of course, if someone has to 'go' and says so etc and the other person is like 'oh well' and moves on without a thought to someone else, that's another issue.
