You're only saying that to piss me off, aren't you?
It's best to accept the seven hours a day rather than ignore them, you'll live a longer life that way.
Does searching for people you know in real life online count as a life?
Xaldin stories were the best.
I know it's like verbal pork and beans.
1.Shuya Nanahara 2.Korea 3.Jube 4.Mirai 5.Repliku
We live once and only once. I say this because you can't have lived more than once if you think about it in terms of biological chemistry. Your brain holds everything that you are and everything that you feel, remember, and act on. The time when that shuts down you're body decays and everything that you were goes back into being it's constituent materials, including your now dead brain. In essence life is like natures way of keeping meat fresh and no matter what you think of feel when your meat rots your brain and self ends up gone, never to be seen heard from or felt again.
I suspect multis.
It offends my sensibilities. Other than that it isn't so bad.
I hate Texas. It's shape is way ****ed up.
Shows a few too many traits of prose in my opinion. The rhythm when reading it is slightly messed up by this. The rhyming scheme was existent but flawed, seeing as it wasn't really consistent over the corresponding sections, neither was the format really. These things aren't really wrong, seeing as common types of poetry tend to be the most flexible and forgiving styles of writing in existence. I wouldn't really call it exceptional in any aspect, so I'll hand it to you, you're not bad.
Not bad. I enjoyed it, in spite of errors in usage and grammar as well a typos. I'm not sure I understood your meaning in writing this, but either way it is a fairly well written piece. No real complaints here.
In my experience I'd never thought I could hate a book until I read Treasure Island. The beginning was too boring for words and I have yet to finish it. To put some perspective on this the 1600+ page Three Kingdoms was easy to finish in comparison.
I remember this from elementary school, I never understood why everyone that heard it seemed to think it was so funny.
Though there is one one chapter up on onemanga it seems like a very interesting series spawned from the very interesting collaboration of Stan Lee and Takei Hiroyuki. In brief it's about the two opposite beings Ultimo and Vice who have the ability to transform their bodies into weapons based in a power called wisdom and battle it out for no apparent reason. The art style is a major plus in my opinion and the story seems like it could be good.
It's not really about ghosts. It's about spirituality and humanity more than anything else. I liked it because the concept was centered around fighting not based on sheer brute power but knowledge and spirit. Also, there were some really cool looking parts.
No. I mean it's definitely not for guys, it's far too cutesy for it to be geared towards the male constituency. Though this shouldn't stop them from reading if they like it, all I'm saying is it isn't meant for guys. Don't try to tell me what I meant to say.
Prediction of the future, in any capacity, based on anything but facts is impossible. Nostradamus for example used very vague language in his so called prophecies and admitted to believing they were nothing more than drivel, however some people seem to believe that through twisting his words to fit a situation he had in fact told of the future. If anyone can predict something and tell beforehand what is going to happen exactly in a way that eliminates all vagueness or twist from the equation then maybe the future can be told, since no one has ever done so consistently it is impossible as of yet to see into the "future".
I read part of this book, and it was intriguing to say the least. Though there really is not a definitive method to warring as each situation needs it's own handling and general rules leave so much open for the person to error or succeed on their own. So, I do find the philosophical concepts and the ideas to hold fairly close to truth, but they are really nothing but a base for how you should tech your mind how to view the situation and more clearly make a decision. So no in and of itself it isn't an effective way of war, it's teachings may lead to an effective way in the wrong hands though.
Okay, sorry for for the delay. I also apologize for my lack of helpful input. Though I do believe there are several plot points that aren't quite to my liking I'm here to look at the technical as is my tradition. The most clear problem you have here is the use of words in the wrong places. I can't seem to think of any outstanding examples at said time but you do tend to use words in ways that their meanings don't fit. The words you use are sometimes similar and thus the confusion, whereas others you just use wrong definitions. Ex. I concurred my fear of darkness. Versus I conquered my fear of darkness. Editing by someone with a larger grammatical and verbal vocabulary is recommended. Second there are a few past present disagreements in your writing. The story is told entirely as if it were in the past and as such needs to be entirely written in the past tense, however from time to time a present tense verb sneaks in where it doesn't belong. Ex. Present: Sora is running away from the threat. Past: Sora ran from the threat. So keep those straight a bit better. One more thing, you get sayings and proverbs slightly confused at times. I suggest you get yourself a dedicated editor, for these problems because though they are minor they are numerous when combined, not to mention all the typos. I'd be glad if this helped you at all. Edit: I have no judgment on which ending would be better, it's all about how well it's written.
