First there are a few structural problems. Neck is too thick, hand structure is wrong. Head is too elongated and flattened. The ear seems to be sprouting from the cheek and the head is too far to the left side of the neck. There needs to be depth, just because it's on a flat surface doesn't mean it has to look like it. There are three dimensions to images, you need to create the back to front dimension when you draw. Do this by making things on a realistic concrete model, think of it like the way one would draw a cube or other three dimensional figure. I suggest a bit of study on how things work and a bit of copying or emulating real life.
Can I have it? I'm saying for free or anything, well you know.
If I remember correctly some members still have it around, I just wish I knew who.
Before your time the most well know guy on the site, Roxas, made an amusing song about the site, it's gone from youtube now and he's been permabanned, that's all.
Re: Your Brains or Still Alive?
Who has it on mp3?
These are the good times people.
I seem to be saying this a lot today, but it would be wisest for you to try creating depth. You have the guy hanging his arm in a leaning position but it's not foreshortened at all and it seems that he's not leaning but holding his arm there awkwardly without even resting it on the thing next to him. The same applies to his legs, they both look rather flat and don't interact well with each other. One looks like doesn't connect to a thigh and just starts at the knee. The other doesn't give the impression of moving forwards, but rather straight off to the side. While I'm on the subject of the legs, I'd like to point out how disproportionately thin and short they are in relation to the body. The neck is also too thick. So, I'll give you that this was a rather difficult position to draw to begin with, but there are a lot of interaction errors that you should consider working out in the future. My best advice to you is to work on body structure starting from the skeleton and muscles, then moving onto physics of interaction with each other and the environment, that's where the problems seem to lie.
It had porn on it?
Solar panels are still expensive for individuals expensive, to break even on them you have to keep them for about as long as they'll last. O3 won't float there on it's own, it's more complex than that. They generally do it with salt anyways, it still uses the energy and causes the pollution of the cars they're replacing just somewhere else.
Make sure they can't tell who's getting raped.
Into beds or back alleys?
It's cause they're brand spankin' new silly. They haven't had all the years to actually develop an understanding of the world. ^_^
For the record, I would.
It's more like a lolicon anthem than a the Pedo Signal.
I don't know. You?
The hand is disproportionately small in relation to the head, or at least it looks to be so. The collar of the vest on the left side seems to extend a little farther than it should, but that's not really such a big deal. I can't find any noticeable flaws other than the above, it's pretty good.
Despite the unfortunate connotations, the word amateur just means that you do your work for yourself rather than for profit, at one time the Olympics were only for amateurs so don't get the wrong idea, amateur versus professional quality isn't always defined by a large difference. But I won't continue to use the word if it so offends you.
Only on Wednesdays.
I understand your concerns and I wouldn't actually suggest doing anything that could mess up the picture as a whole. I'm afraid of backgrounds myself, so I'd never force them on anyone else. If you had a scanner or a copier of some sort you could add a background to a copy without worrying about the original and that'd be fine but as things are it's perfectly reasonable to leave it as is.
