Works for me. Is it Mist-off-feelies? Or Mist-uh-ffeeliess? Or Mist-off-fell-ees? Or what? That has always bothered me, I cannot for the life of Me figure out how to pronounce that.
Did not this already reach the second page before?
Holy ****, your name looks gay now.
I take it the guy was no Falstaff? Probably not even a barrel of monkeys.
I've clocked myself watching Jube's for ten minutes at a time.
Now I'm wondering what the target age group is.
I'm not gonna even bother googling this.
I've been looking at ninja-like beings go through the same bus for over five minutes. There is something wrong with the World.
Grammatical error in the first line. Aside from a few of those I don't think there s much I need to worry about but don't forget to be a bit more vividly descriptive rather than blandly descriptive. Keep going on as you've done and you'll improve. I hate commenting on story lines themselves because of how opinion based that is, but I must say right now that I know exactly where I do not want this to go and hope you don't take it there.
I appreciate that someone at least put up a futile attempt to answer my rhetorical statement.
I still don't get how you got from Jim Carrey to Katy Perry.
Trogdwarf, 'cause cats are smaller than dragons?
Nature is everything in the world, galaxy, and universe that has not been constructed and processes from other things in the world, galaxy, and universe. All wild animals are considered natural because they are how they are due to nature.The difference between tame and wild is a human constructed, a false sense of singularity is born. Humans are also wild animals, they simply have the ability to leave greater scars on the rest of history and recognize more than their basest instinct. All humans are still driven by instinct, to gain more knowledge is not an objective pursuit because it is caused by biased motivations. A scientist may search for it out of love learned from the environment in which he grew up. Just as the zealot will invariably press the detonator in the name of his god this is a learned behavior, though not always so direct. So humans are a part of nature and civilization is an illusion as much as any imaginary world or being. So as we have seen all worlds are controlled not by fact but perception. To a man of God he was born of God and to his fellows he is correct. If all men thought the same then he would be begotten of God. There would be no opposition no doubt in that truth. It is then not only truth but irrefutable fact. Results of tests are all biased. The light entering the eyes of the scientist has no meaning, it is the interpreting brain that gives it meaning. It is the brain that decides if the light exists at all and if it exists at all. That said each man may as well be mad if no other can see his view because they are all right to themselves. That is why truth and fact are governed by choice and consensus, human constructions that are biased and inaccurate. What I tell you all is true. What you tell me is also true, neither contradicts the other, neither can be antithetical. I can fly ten feet above the ground if you think I can and I think I can, but I can't because I don't believe it. Each being is a microcosm. No being is alone. We are all together, but no one sees the same world. So is there a fact beyond human construction? If it exists can we fathom, perceive or even conceive of it? Am I asking you, or are you asking me? I was bored, thoughts?
I always think your drawings lack depth, they are very flat and 2-D, and the body dimensions (or proportions) should be done significantly better, more anatomically correct or more stylized would work for me, this is no exception. Overall this is actually not bad since everything I did not point out above was done correctly and turned out well.
Well, it's unfortunate that you won't be able to finish this at present; or ever, I assume, from your situation but it is an improvement on your work and shows a steady progression. My personal opinion, based on this, is that you should try working a bit on diversifying and developing your style when working with eyes since they are such a huge focal point and you don't seem to have put as much time and effort into developing them to look more distinctive and less generic. But that's just me right now.
I liked the hair on two of three. Well the far right one is supposed to be conservative and I think adding patterning would be something of a betrayal. BUt I thank you anyways. Eh, I'm alright, I'm sure you can do better if you try. I also don't like the far left hair, it is too gaudy for me, I actually went back and altered it later.
I listen to my subjects like any beneficent ruler and I have on multiple occasions been asked to color something. So here it is, this shall stand as the reason why you will never again ask such a silly thing of me. See? Original is here. Cnc as always, I still suck but I see marked improvement in some aspects.
Do not pay more than the equivalent of $20 US. It's arguably entertaining, but not really worth more than that. So a no from me I think.
Pregnancy and pictures are what he's referring to.
