Unless you wanna 100% finish all sidequests, levelups, items and whatnot Folklore will end real fast.
SCIV is a terrible game to button mash on. SCII was the BEST game to button mash on. Whenever you're ready I'm more than willing to be your sparring partner.
But I am le tired, [check] go back to sleep.
Well, I like my compliments better in context where they sound more encouraging. Though indirectly, I did essentially say that you did better than some professional writers on your first try. So don't complain. Though I wasn't a huge fan of Arthur Miller he was still good and I still acknowledge his skill, as much as Death of a Salesman was not meant for highschool students in the 21st century. If you were taking all your cues from August Wilson, however, I'd have to refrain from posting my thoughts lest I say something that gets me banned. Either way, it's best to look into more than one era and more than one writer obvious as that may sound, it's the best advice I can ever give to anyone in need of reference or inspiration. After I'd posted I realized that very point, actually. People generally don't speak correctly but when I'm online I make and effort to be more or less clean and accurate so I tend to forget that in normal speech even I leave a lot of things hanging strangely like that so I'll concede the round on that one. People told me to do that with Shakespeare and Miller. I told them, lemme just watch it. I'm telling you, lemme just watch it. Challenge accepted? Final note: Yada yada yada, I get you, yada yada yada, it makes sense, yada yada yada, roosters are the devil and I hate them. Formatting is quite a chore on this site I'll admit, moreso for this than a regular story, too. Salute.
You pretty much proved my point here. I said gratiuitous, as in, too much. Swearing emphatically makes sense in the context of carrying a meaning. If, however, everything has an intensifier there's no control sample for normal so the intensified statement becomes the normal. Basically, if you ****ing throw it ****ing in ****ing every-****ing-where it ****ing loses its ****ing place as a ****ing intensifier, you ****ing get it ****er?
First I noticed the scale was starting read when nothing was on it, then I felt the shaking, wondered if the tiny nuclear reactor next door had run amok, then I remembered it could barely boil water. Shaking ended. Everyone in the lab went to the main room and looked at each other for a minute. The Russian guy said he was going outside, then we all went back to work.
While I'm not a fan of the word, it's for a different reason than some people. I don't like uncreative insults. I really hate it when people bring around their canned verbage and done to death lines and try to act superior over it. If you're too simple to even come up with your own ways to orally assault your enemies, then you're in no position to try. It's all well and good to argue whether it's the feeling or the term itself that is offensive, but I don't really care about that. Contexts and connotations will change, it's part of the inevitable march of language. However, it represents a degradation of wit and education in people as a whole when people have such impovershed vocabularies that they'd resort to such weak willed insults. Intelligent, knowledgeable people can and will insult in far more relevant, biting ways without dragging in extraneous terms. I have the same problem with gratiutous swearing. You can get your message across just as well, possibly even better if you think about what you're going to say and choose your words accurately and deliberately. When it really comes down to it cheaply insulting people, witty or not, is also a sort of weak way to live in itself. Just being better than other people should be enough and people should be mature enough not to feel the need to rely on insults most of the time. However, I'll just assume that as humans we're never growing out of our scornful, egotistic ways.
You're supposed to put a comma before a direct address, Wolfie. Observen bien.
Sixty-nine, dudes!
Question not my intentions foolish jackanapes! I wish for an adorable infant canine and you shall do naught to halt my progress!
I wish I had a puppy.
Alright, so here's the deal. This is just one scene so I don't know the plot and will not/cannot comment on that. This is also a play so I really don't know how to approach it stylistically as I've never written or edited one before. So back to basics. Grammar. Missing a couple of commas here and there, no big. But this sentence right here, "The world has been unkind to us both, beating us down by the winds of change, by the youth tearing us down for profit and with that type of world now surrounding this town..." Most specifically this part here, "beating us down by the winds of change, by the youth tearing us down for profit", kind of confuses me. The man is getting beaten by the world using these things in the context of the senstence so it should likely look more like, "The world has been unkind to us both, beating us down with the winds of change, with the youth tearing us down for profit...", or, "The world has been unkind to us both. We've been beaten by the winds of change, by the youth tearing us down for profit..." Last part of the sentence with the type of world bit might need to be offset with a comma or semi colon and some modifications or something to make it clearer, even putting it in a second sentence wouldn't hurt. Now my overall impression is this is a bit too dramatic. I get it, plays are drama. I prefer a slightly more subtle vibe even if I can respect works that do this level of drama. So I'm not saying to change it so much as it's not much cup of tea. Secondly I hate reading plays, I love watching them. So much is missed when it's not acted out and it's often an entirely pointless excercise to read plays that have less than a certain amount of stage direction (I'm looking at you Shakespeare.) So overall it's not a bad try. There's worse first scenes that get the green light to run on stage, so I won't complain. Final note: Roosters will at (all) times choose to crow all day and night. I don't even know when they sleep. I hate roosters.
Was thinking this. ^ To make the post legit: OP has a nice group of shots. The faces, while technically solid in most every way I can see are nothing special without their short timescale. But hey, I'd be a total tool if I expected you to have a full and complete drawing in 3-4 minutes. Main thing I like about them is how they look really human, like I might be able to recognize someone based on them in spite of their simplicity. Bottom right looks kinda odd though, like the extra lines change the way I see the shape of the face. To me, feet are always a reminder of how much I fail at perspective. For you however, it doesn't seem to be the case. You can do it all form multiple angles to shadows to shoes. I know this is likely a learned behavior but you can still color me three shades of green and impressed.
Lesbian cop, Steamboy and Mikoto versus Garl Vinland.
In the name of full disclosure I do favor being the dominant party in a relationship, though on a purely mental and emotional level and that...
I never actually was able to toggle my mood and it always appeared blank so I never really noticed it was gone.
I'm glad that my feelings on the issue aren't mine alone. And I do agree that it is a pleasant feeling, being able to talk like this as if it's...
Ah, trust, it's you who brings out this side of me. My favorite side in more ways than one, I'll admit is probably the reason for this particular...
I find my strength to be more in my ears than my tongue. I only speak that I may later listen. Consequently, my list of topics is sparse. As for...
Man is doing it wrong, hooker not only survived but got paid as well, next thing we know she'll want equal rights.
