>dat username >dat avatar Yup, that's pretty '07 alright.
Like, comment and subscribe, really helps me out.
I always knew that on the inside you were a horrible person. Ban the witch.
Maths is different in great Nippon.
Thread #70.000!
I play it for the yaoi.
The creator has said he wants to make a sequel, and that he already has a story written for it. Let's hope DD2 can be as silly as DD was, if it...
Neither did I! Seems like literally anyone can be your love interest in this game, even faceless prison guards :v I did actually end up with the...
Shhh, the google overlords are lisetning
http://i.imgur.com/xPgmBfb.jpg
It was better than MW2 (the last CoD I played before Blops2), but it still wasn't all that great. It was obviously going for the 'MURRICA type of feeling. The worst part about being in the military was people playing the campaign over and over again.
What if I only own the original?
withnotboth. jpg?
Aw, this would have been pretty neat, Grim Fandango is one of my favourite games. even though I never beat it
Let's not forget who was pulling out the greentext here. You shouldn't escalate things if you can't handle the situation you're creating.
I was actually asking, but just because I'm asking means I'm not allowed to put question your answer? That sounds like the thinking of nazi. And risk is actually mentioning a legit way of playing the games. Glitching Wind Waker is not. And it's not like there isn't a genre definition out there that would eliminate these problems. It's called hack 'n slash.
Exactly, beat 'em up. Which means that God Hand is not the same as the other Platinum games. Your entire arguement here seems to be "Other genres have false definitions, so it's alright for this one to do it too!"
At least I'm not the one spouting nonsense like God Hand fitting into your made up definition.
Let's not change the subject here, everybody knows that the JRPG definition is outdated and sucks, but it's been around since for ages and it would be difficult to change it. This whole "Character Action Game" thing is pretty new though, so there's no reason for it to have the same problems.
So in other words, you can play a CAG game without doing what makes the CAG game a CAG game? That sounds like a pretty bad definition you've got there.
