Just gonna agree to disagree and end it here.
You're missing the point. Arguing about this specific thing never works out because both parties (the one who may or may not be upset, and the accusing party) will never agree. Or have you never had this situation?
Pro-tip: when arguing about whether or not you were/are upset, don't keep insisting that you weren't/aren't. It doesn't help your case.
Everyone who is upset says this, y'know.
Having played part of Arkham Origins, the game itself just feels so...inoffensive. It does nothing new or innovative, but also manages not to screw up gameplay or graphics, simply following in the tracks of the far superior previous two games and adding nothing. Its depiction of Batman is nothing interesting (with probably the most interesting being Arkham City's version, though of course no version of Batman is all that colorful--the dude dresses in black every night., but more criminal is that it does nothing for the villains who help define Batman, ironically the game's selling tag. The levels are big, but full of nothingness, wasting the square footage of Gotham City simply to say "we have a big playground!" which only equates to having to run around for longer distances while seeing the same stretches of bland background activity (or lack thereof.) The boss battles are brainless; though few of the other games' bosses were challenging or interesting, Arkham Origins hits a new low with its reliance of (repetitive) quick time events and meaningless environments for conflicts. Seriously, you first fight Deathstroke in some underground arena after you've dealt with Penguin and some worthless electric glove guy who's supposed to be one of the assassins...wow. I still hold hope for Arkham Knight because it's at least doing something different, introducing a new character to the story. This could have drastic effects on the story....but that is yet to be seen until we can play the game ourselves. At least the gameplay looks to be improved on in ways that won't feel pointless, at least to me.
Whom?
Sell me.
Apparently the series "Gravity Falls" is really good, but I've never watched anything with that kind of art style and taken it seriously. Should I give it a chance?
Trying another Band: Nine Inch Nails Album: The Fragile Stand Name: The Great Below Stand Ability: [Demonic Infusion] Power - C Speed - C Range - B Durability - E Precision - A Potential - A Yo, I really like this one.
Stick a musical artist and one of their albums in, get Stand. Band: 30 Seconds to Mars Album: Love Lust Faith + Dreams Stand Name: BRIGHT LIGHTS Stand Ability: [Mechanical Limb Generation] Power - D Speed - D Range - B Durability - C Precision - D Potential - B
Fine I'll watch them.
Sounds like I would hate it too.
Whom? No too late You're on the hit list
Oh man this will hurt my enjoyment.
My favorite group of nerds are doing an LP of the greatest version of the greatest horror game ever. Yup, fuck the HD Collection.
Be sure you won't get banned for streaming a film on Twitch tho.
Yup, a few days at least. Regularly reached 110+ throughout summer.
I can understand that; it really is a very different feeling watching horror games versus playing them, and I'd argue that this is equally true for most genres. Exceptions being many of the more cinematic games that focus less on game mechanics and more on storytelling.
Conversely, if you're just SITTING in your house and find yourself in a pool of your own sweat, and would rather be at school or a store or ANYWHERE ELSE that has air conditioning, THEN you can talk to me about how having no cooling in an Arizona summer wouldn't bother you. Seriously had to stay at a hotel for like a week because it got to be too much for my family. Twice.
Yeah, I don't do the commentary thing on these games since...well, I usually don't know what to say, and when I'm super focused, I stop talking :x
