Search Results

FORGOT TO SAY THIS BEFORE but added~

But yeah, Krowley is right. For that reason, I don't think there's really a reason to remove the username info from the profile URLs.

847

I checked and could not find one available. I can see if a dev would be willing to create one and get an estimate from them, but this is pretty low priority currently.

Ah, didn't notice that, thanks! There's another code I forgot to include as well, so I'll add 'em in within the next day or so.

poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop

Fixed.

That's how the scrollbox has always operated, it's on my list to fix it.

Eh, I guess I can live with this.

I know something you could ship ;)

plums/cinnamon rolls forever otp

Missing the strike-through, 0/10.

Ah yeah, that page has been borked for a while now, lol. It's still accessible through the link, but otherwise it's hidden from pulling up on the site since it was so messed up, and now thankfully deprecated.

I wouldn't mind it, could be useful for a lot of folk. Want to hear what others have to say though.

I've been thinking of bringing it back! :] Since inactivity was a problem & site activity has gone down from then, I'm putting together a way that it could function without having to require too much out of participants, as well as be more easily accessible in terms of books (and not have a daunting backlog). Can't say for sure when it'll be ready, but it will be here when it's ready and packing some literary heat. B)

I'm proud of you, even though

it is guaranteed to happen again (especially whenever I get on the podcast because I feel the same looool). Anyway, listening now~

Rejected on request. I will say I'll keep it in mind for reference, but as of the moment there's just not that much information provided on the add-on to comfortably install it. Message me if you've any questions.

LOCKED

Unfortunately, I'm absolutely against it, I'm afraid. Anonymity tends to bring with it a slew of problems for people, mainly in the form of anonymous hate and other such things. Like cstar and Spunkeh said, I can only see it bringing more harm than good. I did see the developer mentioning about possibly making it occur in only specific threads, but as it's still on Version 1.0 I don't think that got anywhere yet. Even then, I'd rather not have it enabled as Cat can still see and identify troubling messages and report them so staff can effectively deal with it. With an anonymous feature, unless we could still view IPs with it, that portion of the job would get significantly harder for no gain.