Again. The video Fuzzy posted. Also, research you could easily do. Okay, so... Your point from this reply is what, exactly? Your entire point in the thread has been saying it's always unhealthy... And now, you say "Okay. It might be unhealthy sometimes, rarely." Either stick to your guns or fully admit. @Luna, Argh... Why does nobody pay attention to the video, or even research it? @Later Celestia, Argh... That's actually incredibly offensive.
Which is really what I care about.
I edited my post, by the way. Back to the reply. The human is healthy, watch the video Fuzzy posted. It is just sexuality. It cannot be an illness.
*bends ovuahaherrrhuahurr*
E Yeah no. If I find someone I love, it will be sad to let them go, I might protest. "OS Patients", by the way, was the most offensive thing I've seen in this thread. Anyway. OS people are simply in love with objects. They literally own the one they love (in certain cases), but your point? It is different from what you know as your sexuality. The object, to the person, is the perfect one. What is wrong with owning them, as long as they don't obsess? Main point. Everyone obsesses to a small degree over who they love. @Celestia, Very mature. Anyway, a textbook human/human relationship is that. Human/object, on the other hand, is very different. Hm. On your last point, it's utterly different. Object sexuality is right there, it's legitimate, it's real, it's what happens. And believe it or not, accept it or not, it's healthy.
ahuauauahhahahahurr
ahhurr harr
Owning your partner? Not necessarilly. It could be with any object, not one they own, another point I should have brought up. Anywho. Owning them is possession, yes. Possession does not mean obsession. Hoarding is possessing and obsessing. I could obsess over a girl I love and not possess her. And someone could possess their partner and not obsess, or obsess to a small degree. Stop bringing up points that are only true about a select members of the sexuality. @May Kitsune, all humans are lonely at some point. They truly love and are attracted to objects. What is wrong?
New meaning to phone sex
Much thanks. I find it unfortunate for discrimination of any type to ever happen.
Heh. I suppose, I generally act passive in the Spam Zone simply because you're supposed to take things lightly, etcetera. Thank you, I guess. I...
But, there are only extreme cases of possessiveness, as you yourself stated. It seems you may have been contradicting yourself. Sure, people with OS may be extremely possessive. Bur anyone can be possessive. @May Kitsune, there have been cases from the past, do look into it. Also. I notice only one similarity between hoarding and OS. There are objects involved.
Confused, somewhat. You were in the object sexuality thread, correct? If so, thank you.
All sexualites have existed since humans began. But would you dare such cruel torture and offense? It is the same with transsexuality, homosexuality, etcetera. Only recently did peope begin to come out in large amounts. Thus, object sexuality, is real. It doesn't matter how you "see" it. It exists, and you do do not belong to object sexuality, so you can't prove it. Also, your earlier point about scientists proving homosexuality... your point? They only recently discovered that, and homosexuality ha been accepted longer, brought into the spotlight more often. Anywho. No matter how you judge it, or dislike it, object sexuality is legitimate. @Luna, You cannot judge object sexuality as being "too" attracted. Relating to what Noroz said, I am not "too" attracted to women. It is simply their sexuality. Sexualities are not illnesses, no matter how you look at it.
Meh. Perhaps, but some psychologists also consider other sexualities illnesses. As long as you consider to call it object sexuality, it can't be an illness. Perhaps strange, considered wrong, but it is not an illness.
Argh. It is sexuality, do not diagnose it as a symptom of anything. Can't one be attached to something without being accused? Hoarding is a mental illness. But it is due to extreme like. I am not going to go proposition my best friend. Yet, I see your point, and understand. Perhaps I am just stubborn, but I refuse to let this be called a mental illness while none of us have experienced it. @May Kitsune, They don't need the objects to speak, or anything, they are just attracted to them. Your growing bombardment on an actual sexuality grows offensive.
He was Referring to your absence from KHV. Tigers and Rats, oh my.
This seems as if to say," being gay isn't real. It's fake.", though gay could be replaced with any sexuality. Hundreds and thousands of people get no attention, and yet they do it anyway. This is because it is their sexuality. You are not attracted to inanimate objects. You cannot prove it is fake. I feel, anyone who is not of a sexuality, should not try to disprove its existence. Object sexuality is legitimate. @Celestia. The fact that liking an object and be sexually and romantically interested in an object are completely different.
Spare key of Sword @Machazao VOOOOOOOIIIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDD
@Celestia, What gives you the right to call something different a flaw? Though it may not be the norm, or what could be understood as strange, does not make it a flaw. So they love an object. People love all sorts of things. Some of it has, perhaps rightfully been deemed illegal due to abuse, but it is still sexuality. Pedophilia, or bestiality, they both are wrong, simply due to society and basic understanding of what humans are "meant" to do. I am not saying I object to them being illegal, it is abusive in practically all cases. Yet. It is something animal, they were born with it. As you are not attracted to objects, you cannot safely call it a flaw. You may need, like most humans and animals, interaction. But perhaps these people do not. I don't know. Maybe it's different and strange. But it isn't really a flaw with them as a human, for that is how they were made, it is what they require. What they love.
