2. Acceptable. 3. Unacceptable. 4. I still do not understand.
2. I disagree. While everyone does necessarily project to a certain extent because that is how we view the world, I am not in this case stepping outside the bounds of normal on that front. I'm not assuming that this person is at all like me. You are grasping at a connection that does not exist, that is all. 3. Your list is wrong. It is rife with assumptions of understanding that cannot be confirmed. If we go in order, hatok posts first and explicitly asks what the point of that is. Next, Accelerator shares this stance and posts an image indicating as much. After him, Peace-and_war makes a tangentially related statement. It can be assumed that he thinks the final person is not a prick. Below responds to hatok with a joke answer, his statement cannot be taken to indicate he stands on either side of this. Ars Nova then describes the image to hatok. I express an objection to the idea that the image is an indicator of positive social interaction. Digital Atlas agrees with the idea that the image is an indicator of positive social interaction. Stuff happens. Androssi makes a joke that does not express an opinion either way on the topic. More stuff happens. tale_wind says something not related to the original thesis and cannot be assumed to care for the topic. So your list has five people who agree with the thesis. Including two people who did not show a definite opinion and two people that posted their opinions after my first post where this started. You should correct that or at least confirm it before treating it like it is a viable source of information to argue from. So we now have 3 people who may or may not get it and agree with it and 2 people who don't get it and me who may or may not get it but certainly disagrees with it. That's fairly even and if we consider that two of the people who definitively agree with the initial statement posted after I started down this road I had an not understanding majority to start from so it made sense to consider the point at least ambiguous. So I concede that it was one person and not no one as previously stated that understood. But I did have a majority justification at the time. 4. I do not understand.
1. Sure. 2. It doesn't seem like they are being courteous to me. It seems like they are trying to "handle" this person. They're treating someone else like they are less than them by trying to manipulate them with less direct language rather than simply telling them their own opinion on the matter or better yet, dropping the comment and letting this whole thing go. As I may or may not have done in a more ideal universe. 3. I'm calling him out because I wanted his explanation because he posted it and no one else in the tread was comprehending his point, which does indeed lead my to believe that he's wrong in making it. 4. I am not being condescending at all.
I was just demonstrating how self important and unpleasant it seems when people use language as was used in that post. If you don't understand why that poster was not being respectful to anyone else and rather choosing to look down his nose and disparage other people's opinions, then there is nothing more to discuss.
I'm sure you're speaking objectively.
The guy was being a patronizing douchetool. I don't think you want to encourage that.
And this is showing maturity how?
How cute, he thought it was a typo.
When I came back and this was still not a musclegirl thread, I died again.
Best Friend - Harime Nui First Kiss - Mikisugi Aikuro Lover - Sanageyama Uzu Flirt - Kiryuin Satsuki Crush - Mankanshoku Mako Cockblock - Harime Nui I read a doujin like this once.
That's actually what ghosts are. That's why ghosts can float and glow in the dark.
Don't you mean...
I personally prefer MMA, because it's closer to what I know and I can pick apart technique and strategy much easier.
