It's Mamimi from Fooly Cooly.
< Negative < None < Positive I'd personally like to see some gradient or something flashy and eye-catching.
Let's not make comments which could be seen as hurtful. I'll get an example of the rep gems so you can all see.
Eh...I was just doing my job. It's very short of amazing or graceful.
You could, you know, explain your view on why the post could be legitimate. Or ask a mod. We don't bite (as opposed to what some may think ;D) Anyhow, Wigglz, if your post was deleted without explanation, you can ask a moderator to look it over for you. We really aren't out to get anyone, we do try our best to treat everyone equally. I'm gonna lock this before it devolves into something else. _Locked
If you find that your post was unfairly deleted, and/or want to retry with non-spam/longer post, then you can do so by contacting a moderator and kindly explain that you would like your post to be restored. But don't expect Mods to do it ALL the time, though. AutoPM notifies you of the fact that a post was deleted. Unfortunately we can't always see every little detail, or overlook things when deleting, but AutoPM sends a message, so you can go from there. We can't possibly PM every member saying they should add a little bit more substance to their posts. Fortunately, AutoPM does it. If AutoPM isn't working, then you can contact an Administrator who can fix the issue. If your PM does not have a reason stated on it, you can go ahead and ask the moderator who deleted your post, since the AutoPM gets sent from the person who deleted your post. As for your challenge...This isn't a game. If you want your post to be examined, we'll do so. But acting out like this doesn't help. I'm going to keep this thread open for a while, but once it gets enough opinions, I'll lock it.
Oh, not at all. What's tragic is choosing things that lead to a death that could have been avoided. Which is the point I was trying to make. Just to clarify, no one here is justifying her choice to die. Feeling sympathy and justifying reckless actions are two different things. But patronizing the dead seems kind of moot, it's not like they can hear it anyhow. And on this point, not everyone grows in the same way, comparing sufferings is also somewhat moot, because maybe a certain problem doesn't hurt me as much, but another does. And vice-versa with another person. Amy Winehouse had such a unique voice. It really was like a breath of fresh air. It wasn't the most developed voice, but it was so peculiar and interesting. It's a shame she threw her chances away like that.
Can I just say that there's too many book choices? As such the votes are narrowed too thin. I say polls should probably have around five choices max. And I'm hoping books not chosen this time can be placed on future polls.
I love you Zter. Now explain how you managed to get so many trophies.
No. And it really isn't her fault that her death got so much coverage. Celebrities don't choose that. Regardless of which way you look at it from, the fact that a life was lost that way, is not a good thing. I could have the doors to heaven open to me for salvation, and if I rejected it somehow, it'd still be tragic; regardless of it being my decision. She misused what she gained because of whatever sad reason, and even had so many chances, but felt so clouded and lost, that instead went on until she destroyed herself. @Daxma: That makes sense. I still stand that it is tragic regardless of the fact that it was her decision. Half of the time you don't realize you're falling into these things , and then you're too cripple to even try and get help.
Unfortunately, not everyone can deal with certain things in life. That's no reason to feel that it's sickening. This isn't survival of the fittest. As for everything else, I agree with Nashida. It is a tragedy. She was really talented, but her addiction got the best of her. And that is tragic. It goes to show that even with Fame and money you can still succumb to sad things.
You did, though. I never would have thought that was Rin Kagamine.
Can you link me to the stock? Anyhow, the lower left seems fine to me. I guess it's probably a rule of thirds thing. Maybe you could add some...
Some people voted for ME? Thanks guise, it means a lot. ; ~ ; Also I agree so much with what was said about CtR's works. There's so many different styles. A lot of the people here are really, really good. And I can only feel honored just being nominated in the same thing as them.
I quite like the colors. I'm wondering how you did the effects on it. There's something I think is wrong with it, but I have no idea what exactly the problem is. It could just be me.
Did you make that signature? I quite like it.
Can I be a Judgemaster? Herpaderp.
So, I only vote for two? Plums: I like the simple thing you went for. The text upside down was pretty creative too. Tummer: This idea is pretty good. But somehow, it feels like it could have been executed better.
I say we have many different rooms. And if a troll invades one, the person with the group gives a signal and everyone leaves little by little to their room. Let's say my signal is pancakes. So if there's a troll and I start talking about pancakes with emphasis, then the members slowly move to my room. Well, it sounds a bit whack, but it could work. Also Chris, marry me.
Well, the tags themselves have lots of things that could be improved on. But it's good to see you're working with stocks to create backgrounds and what not. But the problem with this, is that you've forgetting to blend the Focal point with the tag itself. Also, some of these you should probably find better stocks or use a bit of sharpening, as some look blurry. But it's actually really good you're making tags more fluently now.
