Search Results

Si, exacto! XD

Something about Disney always sparks imagination, espeacially when you're including many of us in the story. It makes for one great story and even better collaberation! ^^
I also found out I'm going to Disney World tomorrow! I'll try and do some "research".

Agreed

But not all of the Politicians are in fact power players. The point is agreeable, but lacks some detail of who Power players actually are and how many politicans actually are.

I'm afraid even Republicans have been forced to take conserverative views, as you can't be both, but yet we are always hated for it. I guess you could say I'm a liberal Republican, just don't tell anyone *shush!*.

Have you ever heard of a "set-up" when you hear one. Congress today are a group of canniveing(Sp?) men and women who know exactly how to ruin something they want to ruin. They know "hand somebody enough power, and they eventually abuse it," they do that every day themselves.

I say Congress "are" because not everyone is corrupt, but the uncorrupt is always outvoted by the corrupt. But yet most of them are of the same party.

I'm not saying he shouldn't be running, I'm also not saying he shouldn't win. On some bases, I beleive he should.

Also, it's not exactly going to be a surprise in the case he does get shot. If he doesn't, it will be a miracle we all will be grateful for. (Also, you do realize that if you simplify 60/40, which is what you are actually supposed to do with odds, you get a 3/2 chance? Just saying.)

Very ture, but not the only motive out there. There's many that I haven't even mentioned.

Not to burst your bubble, but it is highly unlikely he will be shot, maimed, or attacked in any way until he is inaugurated. It is then morons could make the most out of their Anarchist attacks. Also, it must have been great to see him up close! You actually spoke with him? My mother has a friend, who is in fact Hispanic and is actually motivated by Obama's run for Presidency that he may even run after he serves as a senator(He's not even a Senator yet.xD), but yet he is voteing for McCain, and is in fact even pictured with him. Not a "I"mAHUGE FAN!" picture, an actual photograph! So it's pretty obvious, Obama's race has next to to nothing to do with his popularity voteing, but in a good way. Nobody wants to be a race monger.

There are many things I don't agree with Obama on. But yet, he's congenlient(Sp?), a morale boost for the ethnic soup that is America, and also the fact he rarely uses his race, which is actually more popularly termed "Oreo", as he is both Black and White, which gives him even more understanding amonsgt the people, as a running "steroid".

In this way, Obama has his faults, McCain has his faults, but yet they are most likely the best run-for-President Candidates the States have ever seen. Kerry continuously barrated Bush, and the Bush Adminastrastion(To note it wasn't actually Bush) barrated back. Kerry was untrustworthy, a hypocryte to his own religion and a traitor to his country, even though he claime dto have fought for it. (As if, he sold out the country to Vietnam during the war, and when the American side won, Kerry sold out the Vietnamese to the States, saying how primitive they were and how vile their ways were.)

Agreed. But that doesn't change my views exactly. Catholics meet with Freemasons on good terms, but that does not mean they are one. Republcians meet with Democrats, but they are also not one and have corruption within themselves.

Actually the Bill of Rights, more specifically. The founding Fathers penned the first ten amendments themselves and named them the Bill of Rights.

Repliku, the only time I even have the chance of haveing a vote on Barrack Obama, is if he gets elected, lasts the four years, and it's time for reelction. What does a 14 year old have a say in "maeveurs", and "Republican sympathy "tricks""?

I have a great amount of respect for you, Repliku. Please don't try and make me look like some kind of idiot, because that just won't work.

As for a Assasination attempt on Hilary Clinton: It is possible. She does have some dirty secrets in the past, and she keeps secrets as well. That is why I mentioned she may or may not have a hand in the mess if somebody shoots Obama on the base that they are too stupid to realize that we are forty years ahead of the 1960's. Not to say she would, but to note on her somewhat dark past.

To say I'm racist is far from the truth, my friend.

Also, the 7th amendmeant pertains to a free trial in America. it has nothing to do with the Vice-President assuming President if the President is unable to acheive his duites. Also, the 19th Amendment actually has to do with women being able to vote.

That's two amendments from the list.

This is most probably the only time I have actually disagreed with Repliku, as I am usually very agreeable on his viewpoints. However, saying that Bush has ruined this country, and for the personal attacks on my mentionings of Barrack Obama, who i disagree with but respect to a degree.

Outside of the Discussion threads, I'm hopeing we can ignore the debacles of our viewpoints, and not become a school building of sorts where we all have comptempt for one another. Nothing is to be gained fighting.
I'll have to review my later posts to see if I had ever called any one person in particular ignorant but, if the word pertains to Repliku for the moment, I'll have to say the only time he has not seen the actual truths in anything, not everything, for once in his entire time that I've seen on kh-vids.

Pompous is nice word to describe a person, if you dislike them. It would be a word I would use for anybody I would dislike. As for this forum, I wouldn't call anybody that. That word is solely used where I have absolutely no voice. Where I have been riduclued for my Religion, been called "Gay Jay(Just to spike me on my homophobia)", where people mock my very backgrounds, knowledge, and everything else that makes me, me.

Here, despite some people mistakeing my posts and trying to dogde facts, I have a voice. And I consider you all equals, even if you may think I hold myself above anyone else.

You are right that most of the founding fathers were not devout Christains. As I have already stated, many of them were freemasons, who are on good terms with the Catholic community. In fact, there was only one Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independance, and some may even say he was in fact a mason himself. But Charles Carroll, owner of vast lands and wealth in America, had alot to lose if the King found him out for high treason, so he was even prejudiced by his peers of Congress when he signed his name simply "Charles Caroll" on the Declaration, saying there must be numerous people in the colony by that name, and that Carroll was only looking out for himself. So what Carroll did, he marched back to the desk, and finished his signing by putting "of Carlton" right behind his own name. But do you know anything about Free Masonry itself? It called for a male adult, most commonly white as nearly everybody was pejudice in those days, to acknowledge any Supreme Being. The Supreme Being nearly all of the Founding fathers beleived in was God, Almighty. Therefor, the founding fathers were not devout Catholics, but even George Washington prayed to God heartfeltly at the winter terrors of Valley Forge (Sorry for the mix-up, Fort Neccesity is in fact the fort Washington founded, but had next to nothing to do with the Britsh surrender at Saratoga).

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, Country-wise, history-wise, or even political-wise. Can anybody name the first Republican President of the United States of America? The first Republican, not the first Democratic-Reublican, that would be Thomas Jefferson, elected 1801, the first U.S President of the 19th century, and the third President entirely. The answer is Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United states. During the time of the Civil war, and you can hear it even in National Treasure 2, if you so wish, I heard it elsewhere before NT, America was not "is", America the states were "are". They were divided from North and south, Mason-Dixon lined. It is because of Lincoln, as many know, we know live in peace as brothers as states, and as interacial peoples. Lincoln beleived in this country as much as any other President. Probably about as much as another predecesor, Andrew Jackson, 7th President, and the first solely Democratic party President. Now who is older than whom? Nobody. Democratic and Republican are about as old as each other, the only real practically gone party being Whig and Federalist respectfully. "One country, Indivisble..", if you take away the balanced division of these states, you divide us even further.

Maybe you think that, but please remember: Everybody wants Bush to be wrong, and no news, even conserverate news stations, wants to say there were in fact WMDs. So long as we keep to the norm the ignorants have taught us, we will be happy, potentially blown-up ignorants ourselves. As for "disfunctional Democracy", (FINE!), you tell me why Democracy is the worst thing on the planet, the only thing that keeps an entire country together somehow even though we don't realize it, and I will spit upon the dirt I stand on.

You are exactly right, and I agree with you. Democracy is not the problem, it is Politicians hiding behind masks on both sides that are the problem. Whether they be Republican or Democrats, rats run through the halls of Congress and the Senate. Don't think those few Corrupts pose much of a threat? Why don't you go ahead and ask the Roman Empire about that.

Yes, if there is one thing that I love, it is history. History of this nation most of all, because it links to so many other Historys, such as Catholicism, FreeMasonry, Hollywood, immigrants' historys, and many other differating historys. I have so many kinds of country blood in me, I don't know what I honestly am. Also, to note, My Grandfather's side has a longer history in America than my Grandmother's, as my Great Grandfather, the father of my Grandmother, entered the country during the late 19th century, and my Grandfather's history stretch back to Civil War times. It was in fact, during those times, an ancestor of mine, a man of French decent(Sp?), met an Native American women and had a family with the same woman. So, it is safe to say, I also have Native American indian in me. I'm not quite sure of which tribe.

Maybe..just maybe...the change you want is not the change we need. Perhaps.

Also, apparently, I have a very large "contempt" for Democrats. Let me shed some light on what you are alleging with next to little actual proof. My Stepfather, and my granfather, are both in fact Democrats. But as for both of them, my Granfather dislikes what the Democrats have done to try and obliterate the Catholic Faith, the Republican Party, and many other things that this country rests upon. Meanwhile, my Stepfather is just now pulling his life together, and this is the first actual presidental election he is partaking in. If he votes for Obama, the man Repilku feels I hate, I will love my Stepfather as much as I do before the election. I know both my Fathers well, both Biological, and my Stepfather, and I rever to them as parental figures equally. My mother shares this love as well, Despite the fears she has had in the past. Despite the norm Catholics no longer beleive in the Ten Commandments, I still Respect my Mother and Father, Number VI.

I never said don't vote for Obama. Where in the context did I say this? I sincerely hope he doesn't get it,, but what are my hopes for another person to the world? Nothing.

And I said Obama may or may not get shot, but not only on the base of his skin. Not to blame Hilary Clinton, but an extremist may shot Obama just so Hilary wins presidency under (Not the 7th amendment. The 7th amendment pertains to free and fair trial. So scratch off 7th amendment from the above list).

Also, thank you for bringing up Reagan getting shot. To explain to those who don't understand, Reagan was not fatally shot, but in fact took a bullet while exiting the Washington hotel on March 30, 1981. He was shot down by John Hinkley Jr., who was not charged due to a plead of insanity. Three other people were wounded along with Reagan.

I actually meant that evolution is possible. I didn't actually mean men will evolve to the degree where we can give birth. That's the very opposite of my point.

What I mean is the ability of flight, near-animal abilities and such are at some point possible. I'm talking about Flying Homo Sapiens, not flying homos...xD (Credit: George Lopez Show)

I'm afraid it is quite likely, as most do not want to forget the struggles of African-American peoples, and the tradgedies they faced. Did you know that conspirators of the shooting of Martin Luther King consisted of people of more than one race?

Martin Luther King was a man who fought not only for the rights of African people, but also of Hispanic, White and people of other ethnic backgrounds. many Black people feared that King's success might mean the end of a segregation some Black people wanted still around for their own purposes. Many white people felt the same way, and in order to avoid suscpion, the person who pulled the trigger in Nevada, his scope set on a man who beleived in America, who was looking out on the balcnony of a hotel, was a white man by the name of James Earl Ray.

An excrept from "I have a dream": "I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood."

Hypocrisy rules the minds of many, and it is a sad thing.

Also, I usually like to pray for those who usually don't get prayed for alot. It's just my Catholic backgrounds, which I am very proud of.^^

Don't remind me...there's only hope that either McCain gets elected, or that Obama doesn't change everything about America.

I'll take that as a joke since that cannot ever happen, due to the fact of check and balance, and the fact Congress has been demeaning Bush for the past years of his hopefully remembered truthfully, not in the way we see it, blinded, so it's unlikely on the highest degree.

You say you're far less cloudy eyed than the rest of Ameirca...yet you say Bush is an Idiot.....talk about your hypocrytes.

George W. Bush is not the dunder-head ignorants claim he is. They call him a dumb***, yet there's quite a few things he knows that goes beyond Grammar skills. Oh by Golly, if he can't talk right, why should we respect him like *****-whiped Clinton.

The press does everything in its power to make you beleive what you say, only to hide itself from its wrongs.

EDIT: @ Trogdor: Thank you for the correction. It appears I'm just set-up so far to be as "stupid" as the President. Besides, ask any actual person hailing from Spain: Mexican people speak almost an entirely different language from Spanish anyway. It is in fact a dependency on where you live exactly in Mexico that actually pertains to what form of language you speak.

As well, my Great-Grandfather, a once a wealthy Farmer in Italy, gave up almost a fortune in Italian wealth, to live in a country where he would one day become a much less wealthy farmer, striving to feed his family. He would not allow any descendent of his to speak fluent Italian while he lived. "You are American, you speak American."

People usually forget, but there are things official in America, but they winde up abolished anyway. "One Nation, Under God...", The pledge of Allegiance was banned from the country because it might upset Muslims. But even Muslims agreed that that banning was unneccasary.

"Our Lady of Counselance", a title for Mary, the Virgin Mother of Jesus Christ, is the herione of America. If you don't beleive me, leave the rest of us alone and recheck your facts at Washington D.C. Catholics pray to Mary under the title of Lady of Counselance to help heal the sick, and give the terminally sick a writ into heaven if they die under their ailments.

Official Religion: It's an all-out-peaceful war between Protestant, Catholic, Freemasonry, and most recently Muslims and Islamic faiths. Protestant because that's what this country was once monopolied by during Colonial times, Catholic because if it were not for John Carroll, Cousin of Charless Carroll, the longest lived signer of the Declaration of Independance and the only Catholic signer of the same document, no religion besides Protestant and/or Puritans would enjoy freedom of Religion, Freemasonry because at least thirteen signers of the Declaration of Independance were in fact masons, who include John Hancock, George Washington, Thomash Jefferson, John Adams, and Benjamin Franklin to name a few, and Muslims and Islamic faiths have recently joined the dabcle. But because of John Carroll, no one religion will ever be the official religion of these fifty-states, where we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

(Sorry it took me so long to post this segment, I had to share the computer mid-writing)

Riiiiiight. Don't worry, I'm not even going to bother telling you how wrong you are, because you're too ignorant to get it anyway, and I don't want to waste my time

Riiiiiiight, which is exactly why we must speak Spannish to please the Aliens, while the Immigrants break their backs trying their hardest to learn the American language: English. I can ask twenty out of twenty Mexican Immigrants if they think Spannish should be widely spoken in America, and twenty will agree, No.

I'm sure you are. You call me blind, taunting the splinter in my eye, whilst you miss the tree in your own.

You are correct in that assumption. Bush will occasionally translate his own speeches into Spannish while he speaks, as did John Kerry's wife during Kerry's almost rise to Tyrancy...I mean...Presidency... The difference is: Bush speaks it to extend out to a minority group, Teresa Heinz Kerry( Yes, she married the Ketchup Heir and then the same Ketchup Heir became a Republican Senetor and served so honrably, until his mysterious death in a plane crash, therefor giving the vast table condiment fortune to Teresa) used it for Latin-Women empowerment less tactfully, and Obama wants every American to learn the language.

Quite personally, I have no problamo with Learning Spannish, I think it's a great language. But then what happens? We're also supposed to be learning Madrinese(Sp?) which leaves no time for the rest of to learn the language of our own ancestors, such as I have put off learning Italian to learn Spannish now.

Also, as a footnote, Mai'kel, stop with the "Get over it/Get over the changing times" Bull, por favor. It's not changing times, it's changed times, past tense. And I'm not a stubborn person stuck in the past, contrare to what you are saying.

Estás correcto en esa asunción. Bush traducirá de vez en cuando sus propios discursos a Spannish mientras que él habla, al igual que casi la esposa de John Kerry durante la subida de Kerry a Tyrancy… yo significar… la presidencia… La diferencia es: Bush la habla para extender hacia fuera a un grupo minoritario, Teresa que Heinz Kerry (sí, ella casó a heredero de la salsa de tomate y después el mismo heredero de la salsa de tomate hizo un republicano Senetor y sirvió tan honrably, hasta que su muerte misteriosa en un desplome de plano, por consiguiente dando la fortuna extensa del condimento de la tabla a Teresa) utilizó la para la capacitación de las Latino-Mujeres menos discreto, y Obama quisiera que cada americano aprendiera la lengua.

Absolutamente personalmente, no tengo ninguÃŒÂn problamo con el aprendizaje de Spannish, yo pienso que es una gran lengua. ¿Pero por otra parte qué sucede? También nos suponen aprender Madrinese (el SP?) qué hojas ninguÃŒÂn tiempo para el resto para aprender la lengua de nuestros propios antepasados, tales como mí ha puesto apagado el aprendizaje de italiano ahora para aprender Spannish.

También, como nota al pie de la página, Mai'kel, parada con el " Conseguir sobre it/Get sobre el times" cambiante; Bull, favor del por. No está cambiando las épocas, él ha cambiado las épocas, tiempo pasado. Y no soy una persona obstinada pegada en el pasado, contrare a lo que estás diciendo.

你是正确的在那个假定。 布什偶尔地将翻译他自己的讲话成Spannish，当他讲话时，象几乎John Kerry的妻子在凯利的上升期间对Tyrancy…我意味…总统的职务… 区别是： 布什讲它对少数民族延伸，特里萨・凯利的海因茨(是，她与番茄酱继承人结婚同一位番茄酱继承人在飞机失事然后成为了共和党人Senetor并且服务那么honrably，直到他的神奇死亡，因此给浩大的桌调味品时运特里萨)为拉丁妇女援权委婉使用它较少和Obama要每个美国人学会语言。

相当亲自，我没有problamo与学会Spannish，我认为它是一种了不起的语言。 另一方面，但是什么发生？ 我们也应该学会Madrinese (Sp ？) 哪些叶子时间为其余学会我们自己的祖先语言，例如我未投入学会意大利语现在学会Spannish。

并且，作为脚注， Mai'kel，中止与" 克服it/Get在改变的times" 公牛， por厚待。 它不改变时期，它改变了时期，过去时。 并且我不是一个倔强人以前被困住， contrare对什么你说。

*Facepalm* Sorry 'bout that...I'm so used to being bashed for being Republican, I tend to forget that not everybody who attacks my party is exactly liberal.

You got rep anyway, I mean, at least I showed some sense of goodness even if you were left. That rep wasn't pity, it was my sense of being fair.....*shurgs*

But you can't say all of the People in the parties are corrupt. Both sides have good guys and bad guys.

Excuse me, I'm about to burst out in laughter.

NOOOOOO! WEALLY?? I vounder vhy we call-a our country, le mixing pot, non? I live in Florida, where the Mexicans claim as their own territory because another latino group founded the state. Plus, I have have more ethnic groups inside my veins than some. French, Italian, Irish, Scottish, Native American, and I think some Dutch. Don't lecture me about different ethnic groups, for there is where you phailed abyssmally. Obama never did. Not to call him a bad candidate, I'm just saying he has alot of "Un-American" promises like a new "National Anthem(????)" i.e, the Democrats are just as much to blame for the neccasary war as the Republicans. Democrats wanted save Iraq just as much as the Republicans, but then both sides wanted to pull out. Now it's all Bushes fault, since both parties deny ever supporting the war effort, except for a few just D&R's. Well excuese me.

Mexican Alien's get the speacial treatment, meanwhile, actual Mexican Immigrants, Italian Immigrants, French Immigrants, Japanese, Dutch, Chinese, and all of the others are shat upon. I'm sorry it took you that long to realize, but that's the real way it's always been. Get off your high horse.

To satisfy Obama:

Combate apesadumbrado del *Facepalm* el 'que… soy así que utilizado a ser golpeado para ser republicano, tiendo a olvidar que no todos que ataca mi partido es exactamente liberal.

Conseguiste el representante de todos modos, yo significas, por lo menos yo demostraste un cierto sentido de la calidad incluso si te dejaron. Que el representante no era compasión, él era mi sentido de ser ..... *shurgs* justo

Pero no puedes decir que toda la gente en los partidos es corrupta. Ambos lados tienen buenes chico y chicos malos.

Excusarme, yo están a punto de estallar hacia fuera en risa.

¡NOOOOOO! ¿WEALLY?? ¿Vounder I vhy nosotros cala nuestro país, pote de mezcla del le, no? Vivo en la Florida, en donde los mexicanos demandan como su propio territorio porque otro grupo latino fundó el estado. Más, tengo tener grupos más étnicos dentro de mis venas que alguno. Francés, italiano, irlandés, escocés, nativo americano, y yo pensar un cierto holandés. No darme una conferencia sobre diversos grupos étnicos, porque hay donde phailed abyssmally. Obama nunca hizo. Para no llamarlo un mán candidato, soy apenas diciendo él tengo mucho " La O.N.U-American" promesas como un nuevo " Himno nacional (????)" es decir, los Democrats son apenas tanto a culpar por la guerra neccasary como los republicanos. Democrats quisieron excepto Iraq apenas tanto como los republicanos, pero por otra parte ambos lados quisieron sacar. Ahora es todos los arbustos critica, puesto que ambas partes niegan nunca el apoyar del esfuerzo de la guerra, a excepción de algunos D& justo; R. Excuese bien yo.

El extranjero mexicano consigue el tratamiento speacial, mientras tanto, los inmigrantes mexicanos reales, los inmigrantes italianos, los inmigrantes franceses, el japonés, el holandeses, el chinos, y todos los otros están cagados sobre. Lo siento que te tomó que de largo para realizar, pero que es la manera verdadera se es siempre. Conseguir de tu alto caballo.

YEAH! LET'S BLAME BUSH!WHOOOOT! YEAH! BLAME THE PRESDIENT! YES! HE AIN'T LIBERAL, BLAME HIM!

-_-

Besides the unneeded Bush hateing, why can't we blame the people actually responsible? Not the Republicans, not the Democrats, why can't we blame the corrupt Rebulicans and the corrupt Democrats FOR ONCE!

According to the standards of the United States of America, the President doesn't make the laws and neither can his adminstartion. It's the Generally corrupted Democratic Congress that makes the laws. I'm sure there must be a honest Democrat in Congress somehwhere, but obviously the uncorrupted are always out-voted.

And to satisfy Obama:

¡SÍ! ¡DEJAR LA CULPA BUSH DE LOS E.E.U.U.! ¡WHOOOOT! ¡SÍ! ¡CULPAR EL PRESDIENT! ¡SÍ! ¡ÉL NO ES LIBERAL, LO CULPA!

- _-

¿Además de Bush innecesario hateing, por qué no podemos culpar a gente realmente responsable? ¡No los republicanos, no Democrats, porqué no podemos culpan al Rebulicans corrupto y a Democrats corruptos POR UNA VEZ!

Según los estándares de los Estados Unidos de América, el presidente no hace las leyes y ni uno ni otro puede su adminstartion. Es el congreso Democratic generalmente corrompido que hace las leyes. Estoy seguro que debe haber un Democrat honesto en somehwhere del congreso, pero el uncorrupted están vencidas en una votación obviamente siempre.

You're a real, diehard left-winger, aren't you...-_-?

"Wa on (/of?????) Terror", you called it? Somebody has watched Fareheneit 9/11 waaaay too much or something, dude.

And I pretty much understand Bunterx's plight against Republicans here, just by takeing a look at the avie. So what if Republicans don't support Gay marriage as much as Democrats? Either side thinks it's wrong, but the Democrats just say they'll allow it so more people will favor them. Trogdor can say I'm wrong there, but let's try not to back away from the truth, eh Trog?


Now then, "back to the land of On-topic", if this act against the Bill of Rights(I've noticed alot of people just call it The Bill. It's the first ten amendments of the United States of America, not a BBC Cop show.) is allowed to go through, then we go right back to 1660, when the country was ruled on trade by Navigation laws. A time when all a British Soldier needed to search your Ship or Home and charge you with high treason was a piece of paper called a Writ of Assistance. These were next-to-blank papers that only took a few needed words and names to get what they wanted.

Smugglers were heroes to our country back then. They traded with other countries besides England, which was by law what you could not do. John Hancock, needing no introductions or backstory from his status in the country, was in fact a smuggler of goods.

And to satisfy Obama:

¿Eres un izquierdista verdadero, intransigente, no eres tú… - _-?

" Wa en (/of?????) Terror" ¿, lo llamaste? Alguien ha mirado Fareheneit 9/11 waaaay demasiado o algo, tipo.

E I mucho entiende bastante el apuro de Bunterx contra republicanos aquí, apenas takeing una mirada en el avie. ¿Tan qué si los republicanos no apoyan matrimonio homosexual tanto como Democrats? Cualquier lado piensa es incorrecto, pero los Democrats apenas dicen que lo permitirán así que más gente los favorezca. ¿Trogdor puede decir que soy incorrecto allí, pero que nos dejo intentar no mover hacia atrás lejos de la verdad, eh Trog?


Ahora entonces, " de nuevo a la tierra de En-topic" , si este acto contra el Bill de endereza (yo han notado mucha llamada de la gente apenas él el Bill . Es las primeras diez enmiendas de los Estados Unidos de América, no una BBC captura la demostración.) se permite ir a través, después nos remontamos a la derecha a 1660, cuando el país fue gobernado en comercio por leyes de navegación. Una época en que todo el un soldado británico necesario para buscar tu nave u hogar y para encargarte de alta traición era un trozo de papel llamado un decreto judicial de la ayuda. Éstos eran los papeles siguiente-a-en blanco que tomaron solamente algunas palabras y nombres necesarios para conseguir lo que quisieron.

Los contrabandistas entonces eran héroes a nuestra parte posterior del país. Negociaron con otros países además de Inglaterra, que era por ley lo que no podrías hacer. Juan Hancock, no necesitando ninguna introducción o backstory de su estado en el país, era de hecho un contrabandista de mercancías.