Well geez, I'm just telling you for the sake of it. No need to get antsy.
Daily reminder that Shizune H scenes were written by a 15 year old girl
Because you posted in it you dingus.
Does anyone actually play with adult content off? It's just sex. I know everyone here isn't an old man but I'm sure they can atleast handle ****ing without tainting the soul.
Well luckily DmC made only a quarter of DMC4's sales in UK and is doing worse then DMC3 did in Japan. Not to mention the 360 version has completely dropped off of Amazon's top 100 with HD collection being at 40. Hope rides alone.
I'm sorry WHAT!? ARE WE LOOKING AT THE SAME THING HERE!? Look, let me break it down for you. Company makes new game People don't like it Instead of not buying from company all together and potentially having them fall back on the excuse that nobody was interested, buy previous games in recently released HD collection to show more interest in previous games rather then newer games. The idea is that Capcom assumes "Well they didn't like the newer game but they seem to love the older games as they still continue to buy them" HOW IS THIS IMMATURE!? PLEASE TELL ME HOW! I THINK YOU'RE PULLING THINGS OUT OF YOUR ASS AT THIS POINT
You said that as long a series is being continued it's better then it being dead I told you why that was bullshit You said there had to be a different approach to Capcom I showed you that different approach
Life covered in **** over death? I choose death. Being covered in **** is cruel and unusual punishment that nothing should be subjected to. Something ending is inevitable. All series end be it movies, vidya, TV shows and whatever. I lot of people will tell you that they prefer their favorite series to end at a certain point because either everything after that sucks ass or they do not perceive it being good after the ending. Nobody wants 10 more Lion King movies simply because "it's more Lion King". Sure it's more Lion King but Lion King's story is over, it doesn't need to be continued ESPECIALLY if the movies after it are just going to mangle it. See this? This is what you're advocating right now. Killing a franchise and then bringing it back in the form of brain dead mass of flesh that only has the ability to feel pain and suffering will probably make you wish it just stayed dead. Devil May Cry was given to NT because Itsuno was working on Dragon's Dogma. The BETTER question would be "Why Ninja Theory" in which case **** if I know.
Better it be gone for good with 3 great games rather then continue to be soiled with god knows how many **** games. Exactly EVERYONE said DMC2 sucked Every reviewer highlighted WHY it sucked Every fan highlighted why it sucked Nobody liked DMC2 except for those 6 people over there. Capcom HAD to improve on it. If they didn't they would be belittled with the negative reception they got for DMC2. DmC does not get negative reviews Very few people are actually highlighting the problems with the game and the people who do are miniscule to Capcom and Ninja Theory. The reception for DmC is good. They have no reason to change anything about DmC unlike with DMC2 where the reception was so bad and thus HAD to change something about it. Capcom has worked like this for a long time now. If they don't need to change anything then they won't Just look at Megaman 1-10 Are you serious? No like seriously Are you ACTUALLY serious? Is this actually how you live your life? No I've manged to play it on several occasions(both the demo and the full game) But no do not intend on buying this game.
Company is more then just how many good games they make or how known they are. I'm talking specifically about business practices. If a company does something that goes against my principals then I probably won't buy thier game unless it's DAAAAAAAAAAAAMN good. What's your point? That we should buy games no matter how bad they are because of the possibility that the company MIGHT make a good game? Doesn't that sound a tad mindless to you? That kind of attitude allows companies to throw it all kinds of **** without actually having to put effort into anything because there will always be the gauntness's audience who will buy it regardless. How about this. Prove yourself by making a good game and having a good marketing team and then MAYBE people will buy the game. Doesn't that sound fair to you? When you show a company that they can get away with half assed behavior then they will continue to perform half assedly. You also have to realize that DMC2 had largely negative reviews so Capcom would have no excuse for making a sequel exactly the same. DmC does not therefore if it sells well Capcom has no incentive to change anything
You said that the point of buying DMC2 was to see DMC3 As you can see that's not true as nobody wanted to by DMC3 after 2. And with good reason DMC2 sucked. The idea that you should buy something to support a better sequel is stupid. You should buy something based on the company making it and if you like it. DmC is a **** game and Capcom is an ass company so I could care less about what they MIGHT do if I buy it. So I won't.
This is the world we live in today
This is the kind of logic that allows companies like Capcom to pull off **** like on disc DLC and releasing fan made games for free under their own name. Remember that time we all bought Devil May Cry 3 because of how good Devil May Cry 2 was? I don't either. If you provide **** then don't expect to get money. Thank god I bought DMC3 but it took me a few months to actually get it after I played it and liked it because Capcom's last display of Devil May Cry was bollocks. Devil May Cry 3 was good and thus sales for DMC4 were higher then ever.
Actoually..... I'm sorry but... WHAT!? e, I'm well aware that there are flaws with the previous Devil May Cry games as most games tend to have flaws. However if you saw those things as flaws then you seem to have missed the point and in fact missed the point of many forms of entertainment mediums. First and foremost, only the first part describes Dante. The second part is EXACTLY what Donte is. Dante is a clash of old action hero and John Woo films. He's an over the top guy who manages to save the day by making cheesy one liners and saying dorky things like "groovy" and "stylish". He also eats pizza. Is this a flat character with little substance? Yes Is this a flaw? Absolutely not. Realize the implications of what you are saying. By saying that Dante's personality is a flaw then you are saying that every action movie made within the 80's and 90's are flawd due to thier main characters. Rambo, Die Hard, Ever Arnold movie, etc. Hell even some kids show relied on the badass big guy action heroes, however a lot of them were far from flawed, in fact some of those shows and movies were pretty ****ing great. Most people think Evil Dead 3: Army of Darkness is a good movie. Are there flaws with the movie? Of course and I could name them but I don't feel like it. But Ash's character is NOT a flaw. Sure he's a shallow and flat and lacks as much substance as say Batman from the Tim Burton AND Christopher Nolan movies but we love him because he's an enjoyable character to watch. He kills zombies, demons and other creatures while making wise cracking remarks, naming his gun and having a chainsaw as an arm. It's over the top and most of all it's TONGUE IN CHEEK, it doesn't take itself seriously and that's what allows you to enjoy the over the topness of the character. It's the same deal with Dante within DMC1-4 and even Nero to an extent. Dante is a flat character with little substance like Ask or Rambo but he's fun as **** to watch, his acrobatics make us go "whoa", his lines make us go "DANTE WHAT ARE YOU DOING THERE'S A ****ING DEMON IN FRONT OF YOU! NO TIME FOR THIS ****!" and once again it's very TOUNGE IN CHEEK. The Devil May Cry series will never go too long without reminding you how insane and over the top the game is. You can have a serious and touching scene only to have Dante drive up a tower on a motorcycle a few seconds later while shooting ****ers with a rocket launcher bayonet thingemmajig. Now of course you may not like that. Perhaps you can't enjoy those kind of character's no matter what and maybe you DO think the Evil Dead series is bad. But the point is due to the context and manner of the movies/games, these are not flaws for the character but rather what makes them enjoyable in the first place. DmC: Devil May Cry has no idea WHAT it's trying to be. It started off with a silent Donte that was tortured and beat up by demons and **** but then Tameem was like "DAMN! THOSE DMC FANS DON'T LIKE THIS ****! QUICK! TRY AND MAKE HIM SAY COOL STUFF!". The end result was a disaster. We instead have a character who were SUPPOSE to take seriously with his past and his characterization and how he handles situations. But instead his "jokes" and one liners come off as lame, out of place and tasteless because they're done in such a non TONGUE IN CHEEK manner. It also doesn't help that Donte in general is a mean spirited guy who NT tries to advertise as "cool". This is Travis Touchdown He's mean spirited vulgar deluded perverted arrogant cocky He's pretty much exactly like Donte But here's the main difference Travis is fun to watch because of how other character's interact with him. Nobody except the real crazies treat him like some sort of hero. He's constantly called out on his behavior and the Assassins and characters he face generally make fun of him because of his personality and mannerisms. Nobody praises him. Donte is treated like the coolest ****er around. He's placed in a serious story where the game tries to reinforce "Donte is the hero of this story, everything he does is right and he always knows his ****". The game actually wants us to root for Donte wheras with Travis you laugh when you see him fall into a sandpit and have a grenade blow up in his face. And it's hard to root for someone who's as mean spirtied and obnoxious as Donte especially when it's not done in a TONGUE IN CHEEK manner. Twilight didn't ruin vampire. Twilight did not take on the name "Nosferatu" or "Dracula" and attempt re-work the story and characters to their liking in an asinine manner. Twilight simply showed interest in the vampire culture and thus several other books featuring vampires were created. DmC attempts to use the characters and story of Devil May Cry and re-work it for it's own purpose and it comes out pretty bad in my opinion. Because of that I would rather look back on Devil May Cry and let it die as opposed to letting it continue on as a ragged and mangled corpse. It's hard to see things you love have to walk the planet as a zombie regardless of how many other people like to **** that corpse. You can ignore it but does it really make a difference? You would have no problem with if the zombie was just dead in the ground anyway so there's really no difference between wanting to see DMC RIP in peace and ignoring DmC's existence.
Spam and **** posting are two different thinks you schmee.
Haven't we realized that a bunch of teenagers talking about things they don't have an idea about is always a bad idea on this website?
I guess it all depends on how Capcom see's operation crazy If anything atleast we can rest easy that Devil May Cry and rest in peace now http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-01-21-uk-chart-dmc-devil-may-cry-horns-its-way-to-top-spot
Like you said, it depends on the player. DmC's difficulty is a flaw. For someone who doesn't play games for difficulty purposes this is not a major flaw For someone like me who does then yes it is You can love a game despite it's flaws but you're not obliged to. If exploration is the MINIMUM you expect from a Final Fantasy game and Final Fantasy XIII doesn't give you that then that's that, Final Fantasy XIII has been ruined for you and you have every right to feel that way because the game failed to meet the bare minimum of what you expected out of Final Fantasy game. DmC is an action game. It failed to meet the mimimum for a good action game due to several flaws. Thus the game is ruined for me You can have the most beautiful documentary ever with the greatest actors and the crispest sound but if the actually documenting part isn't there then it's a bad documentary and you have every right to not want to watch it.
If you're going to use it in a joking manner then go ahead If you're going to use it as a means to substitute and actual rebbutal then go ahead You also still haven't answered my question as to what you constitute a real flaw in a game. Such as? God of War and Devil May Cry 3 are RADICALLY different games.
