Yeah, I just noticed it said 4 or lower.
So she does.
You do not have Utopia. please summon another one before using Xyz ticket. (strike 1)
Shouldn't you be using this?
No, barian is over hundred numbers.
Then I guess they'll have to decide who lives on, because I'm not allowing anyone to escape easily after entering a duel in this world. But yeah, forfeiting until 1 cure remains is the only way to leave if they refuse to duel each other. Accepting a duel basically locks you into a life or death situation, there's no escaping it.
Just keep in mind that the cures must fight each other eventually during this battle royal. unless darkness beats them all.
Yes. or just do dramatic forfeits. If they go team up while in battle royal, they have to fight each other after they beat whoever they teamed up against.
I declare this duel no longer a battle royal. if the duel is forced to end when you lose, it comes a ? vs. 1. This is to make it fit with my battle royal rule that no one may leave the duel until either all by one or no person stands.
I think it's just that we've got our hands full with our own duels. or we aren't interested. and like I said before, there has never been a successful battle royal duel in the history of this arena.
not banned? just the existence of counter traps makes it less fun to go second. I mean, you have less cards 100% of the time than the guy who went first. also, there are spammable cards like T.G. hyper librarian that can completely bypass your first rule.
Since traps are rather powerful in the arena, and it seems like they aren't hit enough, I suggest a massive hit on all traps that counter your opponent's plays and stick to using mainly situational traps instead. There isn't really any problem with them since their conditions can always be fulfilled in the arena. I feel that since generic traps are powerful in random, they are and will always be too powerful in the arena. With their existence, we'll rarely see situational traps ever be played, even though the point of the arena is to be able to use such situational traps. With stuff like solemn judgment and warning not banned, it defeats the purpose of non-random dueling.
Yeah, I just went through it again and noticed. What's a Pot of Greed?
You started your move with 6 cards. Soul release, dark hole, normal summon gogogo, your field spell, megamorph, and rank-up. you have used all 6 cards. I'm not really sure where you got your extras..
Quite rarely do we have this happen anyway, so I agree on that rule being added.
But did you post about card of compensation being limited? I was talking about how you should post about your edits to the banlist since konami does the same. people don't check every day, there's actually a set date where everyone checks and is informed of all banlist changes. here, however, we don't have a set date for banlist changes, so you should at least tell us that you've changed something instead of having us check all the time. I think it's unnecessary for those who already know the banlist and end up having a game loss for not being informed that you've changed the banlist before their duel started. They wouldn't, and have no right to whine about game loss if you specifically posted before hand to check the banlist for listed changes because it has been updated. Otherwise, it would be partly the fault of the one editing the banlist for not informing the players about its changes. Checking every time we duel and every time we make a move is kind of unpractical. I was just giving an example. If there were a card like Damage Eater with only an OCG copy, they can do that with an excuse. That's why posting the card effect right when it's revealed to the public is important.
About the case where Yakumo accidentally played 2 copies of Compensation without knowing they were limited.. I'm not really sure if you posted about that, but I think we should be notified of any changes to the banlist as they are made. Our players should have basic knowledge of the banlist, but it is unfair for them to get instant game loss via ninja banlisting. That is why I am proposing that we make it a rule that you cannot receive a strike or game loss if you have played a card that was not originally banned or limited and that its limitation or banning had not been notified by the one editing the banlist. They will get to redo their entire move with all cards that were just revealed to the public during that turn alterable. If this happens and the turn had already been passed, the duel will continue as is. I believe that since the official game keeps notifying their players of the next banlist date, it would be appropriate for us to notify whenever we change the banlist. Thus, no players should be help responsible of not having knowledge of a change in the banlist if you do not post that you have changed it in some way. Again, this is just if you don't already do this. I also want this rule to be put into the first page of the duel arena.[DOUBLEPOST=1406167943][/DOUBLEPOST] Imagine if someone dropped a Japanese Damage Eater to their grave. They may not be using it right now, but they may use it in the future. Then it would be unfair for the guy activating a burn damage effect when they had no clue what damage eater did until it's too late. That is why even dropping a card for a cost or card effect is considered using it.
Even when you are just discarding a card, that card is being used. Just, you are using it for a discard. This makes it less confusing to figure out whether something has happened or not. Also, you can't summon Lightening without a rank-up-magic.
A battle royal? I don't think a battle royal had ever been successful in the history of this arena.. if we could pull that off now..
