u = 1 + r + r^2 + r^3.... (1) u*r = r + r^2 + r^3 + r^4.... (2) (1)-(2)=u-u*r= (1 + r + r^2 + r^3....) - ( r + r^2 + r^3 + r^4....) = 1
I don't know what you're talking about and why you think VLC sucks but it does have Hi10p support. And it's the most flexible and customizable media player out there, unless you mean it doesn't have a customizable interface, which is not a good reason to say it sucks anyways.
What sorry, don't apologize to anyone, post whatever you like if someone's got a problem then all you have to do is post this and you're done. Spoiler http://higherintellect.info/texts/art/afinger.txt
When I say you lack basic calclulus knowledge, you think that I say it because I don't know what to tell you. This formula is used in geometric series that converge and has a proof. r is the common ratio; 1/10. If you want to see what 0.333 does then you need to go to the formula and see what happens. Not every series =1. In fact this series converge to 3/7, if I did the calculations correctly.
I suppose your computer is a high-end machine and you have no problems with video playback and lagging. Get an average computer and you'll see how valuable that media player is. With countless features, it is the most powerful video software currently.
Hilarious rap battles... thanks for reminding.
VLC is using its built-in codecs, that's why it's so great. But if you want a modern media player you could use TotalMedia Theatre 5.
Clearly you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about... What don't I know about? You assumed I'm the training guy, how does this make me not knowing how things work lol? Are you trying to start an argument with yourself? That's ****ed up! If you want just let me know, and in a few months you will have a brother (or perhaps sister) with whom you can argue any time you want. =]
Not realy. If you don't know how things work, then don't make assumptions.
Don't compare me with other mathematicians.
Psst chill dude, don't be so sure about that.
I took 3 times differential calculus 1 before I passed it, if I am to explain it "in great detail" I might as well write a book about it and publish it now. You lack basic knowledge in maths (limits and their properties- infinity, convergence/divergence) and I am not the one to teach you them.
One word: convergence.
No, you have to distinguish infinity from numbers. Infinity is not a number, you can't add one more 9 in a number with infinite digits and make it bigger than before. 0,999... is a series as I said earlier and this is the only way it can be accurately expressed. The other proofs you mentioned earlier that it equals 1 are not exactly valid.
The above example in programming is wrong because you have finite digits however you need to create a series to be accurate in this case. Anyways... this 0.999 youre talking about is the series of Σ(9/10^n), n=1->oo (which is, 9/10 + 9/100 + 9/1000 + 9/10000 +...) therefore http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/5/6/9/56949181a290ce561f27bd550a720392.png
First find x^2 and y^2 then add them to create a circle which has a radius of 1... then we need to calculate 3 double integrals, M, Mx and My. all of them will have both integrals' bounds from 0 to 2π, and also it doesn't matter if integrate x or y first (fubini), we will choose whichever is easier. For M: the function inside will just be d, and we integrate that twice. For Mx: the functio inside will be d*y For My: the function inside will be d*x The center of mass will have coordinates x=My/M and y=Mx/M I probably am wrong in the bounds of the integrals because I haven't really gotten into multivariable integrals and always mess up the bounds. Most times I put them randomly :P .
The clock system is actually Z12, and this equation is true in all subgroups of Z12: Z2, Z3, Z4 and Z6. /nerd
Oh, in this case...
It is true in the field Z2, of integers modulo 2.
Facebook is successfully making people stupider.
