This is getting rather annoying. Just get your point across without making the artard remarks. My point was that the bible isn't meant to be taken literally in which every single word becomes fact-- it's open to interpretation like any other religion or faith. The person is god knows (I pun like Jesus) how young and automatically assumes that the answer to every single questions resides in a book and that nothing else could ever be possible. All I was getting at was that there's no point in debating with those that can't think critically for the life of them. The stance of that post was based on the fact that thousands of years ago the Egyptians thought they were right in believing that they arose from the tears of Atum, and years later the Greeks thought that they were right when they believed that Gaia and Uranus spawned the universe from chaos. And now others say that those of the past were all wrong and claim that they hold the ultimate answer: God did it all. It's just an ugly pattern in my opinion, and when you looks at the history in each one all you get is the transformation of one faith into another.
I have yet to meet a creationist believer that doesn't choose to be ignorant of selective parts of evolution theory. Evolution is the progressive change in which lesser organism evolve into more complex organisms and takes millions of years to achieve any hint of fruition. Monkeys are evolving, it's just that anything profound won't be witnessed for a real good chunk of time. But whatever, I'm tired of debating with self-proclaimed enlightened people who take a book whose roots originate from mythologies as old as those in ancient Egypt, to be fact.
The holiday has been raped and commercialized by companies to maximize profits and is open to subjective interpretation. And apparently the character of Jesus was actually born in April.
I've never been a fan of the whole "I used to work" or "I am currently working for" claim that gets slapped on to rumors unless actual evidence is presented. The rumors seem great and all, but there's always room for skepticism.
The DMC series has a very loose continuum concerning all the games since the stories in each one are rather thin to say the least. What can easily be determined is that DMC 3 is the start of the story, followed by the original DMC game. I'm still hazy on how DMC 2 and DMC 4 are ordered as Dante looks the same in both and carries the same sword. I trust libregkd's information but as I've said the only clear connection within the DMC series is DMC 1 and 3.
Dear little 8 pound, 6 ounce baby Jesus I know I'm not much of a praying man and have, on occasion, used the Ten Commandments as a checklist of things to accomplish in my life, but I need you now. Please, please, please make the Transformers Movie good tomorrow and don't allow Michael Bay to rape our collective childhood. T'il all are one.
...
Completely subjective in interpretation. An explosion of the elements implies nothing of atomic fusion (the elements referred to in that verse are the four "natural elements" which in themselves are not actual elements), water being brought up and back down as rain explain the function of percipitation to a bare minimum.
An interesting take on the Gundam game series, but my favourite is still Federation vs Zaft II PLUS.
You should have to be ritually cleased for even harbouring that thought xD.
It's a common stable of the gaming, and most importantly the rpg world. Most companies use it to play it safe because lets face it, a full action rpg can go from being the pride of a company's programming skill to the bottom of the barrel for not keeping the system tight. Square and Blizzard a just a few people that got it right.
There's no problem with helping another person from time to time. What you're getting at is the all out of carrying another person through their burdens which is of course going to leave them dependent on you.
Both the PS3 and Xbox 360 hit major dry spells after GOW and RFM. Sony is still appeasing it's customers with the arrival of their online world, and Microsoft is still holding strong with it's well rooted online community. As of this year, not many "good" games are to be expected for either console, at least in relation to the previous gen. The Wii on the other had has been going strong, but I am worried that diverting production to it will cause a lot of opportunites to be missed out.
Fact: Jesus and Moses used guns to conquer the Romans.
Drinking alcohol was once illegal.
A Poem. Our Obsession with celebrity is unhealthy, It's true and needs to be said But I'd still like to talk about a girl anyway, A girl of whom I saw give head She drove without permission, And she drove loaded with booze We all watched it clearly, On what CNN calls the "news" But there's no point in keeping Paris in jail, Should they even try? I vote we bring back the electric chair, And let that b**** fry.
I'm telling you, a linen and pillow Fortress solves everything!
Amen. There have been far too many games that stress online multiplayer only when offline could've been done just as easily and been included in the game as well. Although there isn't any online co-op experience I'm still ticked that Resident Evil: UC has considered a 2 player co-op with each character's partner.
Build a fortress using all the sheets, pillows, linens, couches and their cushions, and mattresses in your house.
I had a friend poop in a cup, and then we strapped it with explosives and chucked it at a house.
